Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 267.200 (2026)

Existence, status and general powers of districts

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      267.200 Existence, status and general powers of districts. A mass transit district shall constitute a municipal corporation of this state, and a public body, corporate and politic, exercising public power. It shall be considered a unit of local government for the purposes of ORS 190.003 to 190.130, a public employer for the purposes of ORS 236.610 to 236.640, and a political subdivision for the purposes of ORS 305.620. A district and its contractors engaged in operating motor vehicles to provide mass transportation on behalf of the district shall be entitled to tax refunds as allowed under ORS 319.831 to incorporated cities. It shall have full power to carry out the objects of its formation and to that end may:

      (1) Have and use a seal, have perpetual succession, and sue and be sued in its own name.

      (2) Acquire by condemnation, purchase, lease, devise, gift or voluntary grant real and personal property or any interest therein, located inside the boundaries of the district and take, hold, possess and dispose of real and personal property purchased or leased from, or donated by, the United States, or any state, territory, county, city or other public body, nonprofit corporation or person for the purpose of providing or operating a mass transit system in the district and aiding in the objects of the district.

      (3) Contract with the United States or with any county, city, state, or public body, or any of their departments or agencies, or a nonprofit corporation, or any person, for the construction, acquisition, purchase, lease, preservation, improvement, operation or maintenance of any mass transit system.

      (4) Build, construct, purchase, lease, improve, operate and maintain, subject to other applicable provisions of law, all improvements, facilities or equipment necessary or desirable for the mass transit system of the district.

      (5) Enter into contracts and employ agents, engineers, attorneys and other persons and fix their compensation.

      (6) Fix and collect charges for the use of the transit system and other district facilities.

      (7) Construct, acquire, maintain and operate and lease, rent and dispose of passenger terminal facilities, motor vehicle parking facilities and other facilities for the purpose of encouraging use of the mass transit system within the district.

      (8) Enter into contracts or intergovernmental agreements under ORS chapter 190 with units of local government of the State of Oregon, whether within or without the district, or with the State of Washington or with public agencies of the State of Washington, to act jointly or in cooperation with them or to provide mass transit services to areas under their jurisdictions, provided that the party contracting to receive the services shall pay to the mass transit district not less than the proportionate share of the cost of the services that the benefits to the contracting party bear to the total benefits from the service.

      (9) Conduct programs and events and take other actions for the purpose of improving or maintaining employee relations.

      (10) Improve, construct and maintain bridges over navigable streams.

      (11) Do such other acts or things as may be necessary or convenient for the proper exercise of the powers granted to a district by ORS 267.010 to 267.394. [1969 c.643 §8; 1973 c.116 §3; 1975 c.170 §1; 1977 c.550 §1; 1979 c.344 §1; 1979 c.877 §2; 1987 c.689 §1; 2003 c.802 §92; 2007 c.531 §16]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1972–2018 · leading case: Nw. Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Portland, 711 P.2d 119 (Or. 1985).
Nw. Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Portland, 711 P.2d 119 (Or. 1985). · cites it 5× “” ORS 267.200. It is a mass transit district organized pursuant to ORS chapter 267 for the primary purpose of “providing a mass transit system for the people of the district.”
Lane Transit Dist. v. Lane Cnty., 957 P.2d 1217 (Or. 1998). · cites it 3× “135(1) specifies that the transit district board has the power and is required to appoint a general manager: “The board shall appoint a general manager on the basis of the qualifications of the general manager with special reference to the actual experience in or knowledge of…”
Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist. of Or. (Trimet) v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757, 412 P.3d 162 (Or. 2018). “" ORS 267.200(5). Indeed, TriMet does not dispute, for purposes of its summary judgment motion, that its negotiating team may be exercising authority conferred by law when it engages in the bargaining sessions.”
Davis v. Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist., 45 F. Supp. 3d 1222 (D. Or. 2014). · cites it 3× “The Oregon statute relating to the creation and power of mass transit districts, although not specifically enumerating the Veteran’s Preference Statute, defined a mass transit district at all relevant times as both a “public employer” and a “political subdivision” for certain…”
Leppanen v. Lane Transit Dist., 45 P.3d 501 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “As such, it is a public body, ORS 267.200, authorized to acquire real and personal property, ORS 267.”
Haynes v. Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp., 103 P.3d 101 (Or. 2004). “As a mass transit district, TriMet may enact ordinances under ORS 198.”
Emerald PUD v. PP & L, 729 P.2d 552 (Or. 1986). “110(1) (park and recreation districts referred to as both "districts" and "municipal corporations," respectively); ORS 267.200 and 268.300 (metropolitan service districts referred to as both "municipal corporations" and "public bod[ies] corporate and politic, exercising public…”
River Road Water Dist. v. City of Eugene, 492 P.2d 812 (Or. Ct. App. 1972). “” ORS 267.200. ⑬ “(1) Each member of a boundary commission shall receive travel and other expenses incidental to the performance of his duties.”
Haynes v. Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist., 103 P.3d 101 (Or. 2004). “As a mass transit district, Tri-Met may enact ordinances under ORS 198.”
Brookes v. Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist., 526 P.2d 590 (Or. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 3× “ff* ****? ORS 267.200 provides: “* * * It shall have full power to carry out the objects of its formation and to that end may: ff* * * * * “(10) Do such other acts or things as may be necessary or convenient for the proper exercise of the powers granted to a district by this…”
State Ex Rel. Eckles v. Livermore, 696 P.2d 1153 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “305(1), mass transit districts, ORS 267.200(1), and metropolitan service districts, ORS 268.”
Emerald People's Util. Dist. v. Pac. Power & Light Co., 729 P.2d 552 (Or. 1986). “110(1) (park and recreation districts referred to as both “districts” and “municipal corporations,” respectively); ORS 267.200 and 268.300 (metropolitan service districts referred to as both “municipal corporations” and “public bodfies] corporate and politic, exercising public…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 267.200(1) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Eckles v. Livermore, 696 P.2d 1153 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “305(1), mass transit districts, ORS 267.200(1), and metropolitan service districts, ORS 268.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 267.200(11) — 1 case
Nw. Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Portland, 711 P.2d 119 (Or. 1985). “” ORS 267.200. It is a mass transit district organized pursuant to ORS chapter 267 for the primary purpose of “providing a mass transit system for the people of the district.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 267.200(2) — 1 case
Leppanen v. Lane Transit Dist., 45 P.3d 501 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “As such, it is a public body, ORS 267.200, authorized to acquire real and personal property, ORS 267.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 267.200(5) — 2 cases
Lane Transit Dist. v. Lane Cnty., 957 P.2d 1217 (Or. 1998). “135(1) specifies that the transit district board has the power and is required to appoint a general manager: “The board shall appoint a general manager on the basis of the qualifications of the general manager with special reference to the actual experience in or knowledge of…”
Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist. of Or. (Trimet) v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757, 412 P.3d 162 (Or. 2018). “" ORS 267.200(5). Indeed, TriMet does not dispute, for purposes of its summary judgment motion, that its negotiating team may be exercising authority conferred by law when it engages in the bargaining sessions.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 267.200(8) — 1 case
Nw. Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Portland, 711 P.2d 119 (Or. 1985). “” ORS 267.200. It is a mass transit district organized pursuant to ORS chapter 267 for the primary purpose of “providing a mass transit system for the people of the district.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.