Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 276.009 (2026)

Acquisition of state office buildings by installment payments or lease purchase

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      276.009 Acquisition of state office buildings by installment payments or lease purchase. (1) The Oregon Department of Administrative Services may enter into an agreement or agreements with financial institutions to fund or otherwise acquire state office buildings and parking facilities by installment purchase or lease purchase contracts as provided in ORS 276.429. Any moneys so obtained shall be deposited in the Capital Projects Fund. Such acquired facilities may be located in the Capitol Mall area or in communities throughout the state.

      (2) In addition to and not in lieu of any other moneys made available by law, there is established as the maximum amount to be expended for the purposes authorized in subsection (1) of this section and ORS 276.005 (1) the following amounts for the following purposes:

 

 

      (a)  Eugene Regional Center

      Construction         $1

      (b)  Medford Regional Center

      Construction         $1

      (c)  Eugene State Police Facility

      Construction         $1

      (d) Mall Office Building II          $1

 

 

      (3) Subsection (2) of this section does not limit, affect or apply to any expenditures by the department for interest payments while the facilities are under construction, bond counsel and underwriter’s fees, legal fees, escrow or trustee fees, lessor fees or repayment reserves as may be required by the financial institutions. [1983 c.667 §2]

 

      Note: 276.009 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 276 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1989–1989 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Kane v. Goldschmidt, 783 P.2d 988 (Or. 1989).
State Ex Rel. Kane v. Goldschmidt, 783 P.2d 988 (Or. 1989). “The plaintiff seeks a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the defendants to “halt actions and expenditures to implement” chapter 1032 and “not to execute” any contracts thereunder, and to “stop implementation of ORS 276.009, 276.429 and 276.218 to the extent that any proposed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.