285C.150
Conditions required by sponsor for authorization; reports. (1) The sponsor of an urban
enterprise zone may require an eligible business firm seeking authorization
under ORS 285C.140 to satisfy other conditions in order for the firm to be
authorized.
(2) The
conditions that a sponsor may impose under this section must be reasonably
related to the public purpose of providing opportunities for groups of persons,
as defined by the sponsor, to obtain employment, including but not limited to
providing training to these groups of persons.
(3) The sponsor
may establish procedures for monitoring and verifying compliance with
conditions imposed on the firm under this section and require the firm to agree
to the procedures as a condition to authorizing the firm.
(4) Conditions
established under this section may be imposed on a firm only if the sponsor has
adopted a policy that establishes standards for the imposition of the
conditions.
(5) Conditions
imposed by a sponsor under this section shall be in addition to, and not in
lieu of, conditions and requirements imposed under ORS 285C.050 to 285C.250 or
pursuant to an agreement entered into under ORS 285C.160 and do not affect the
duties of the Department of Revenue or of the county assessor under ORS
285C.050 to 285C.250.
(6) A sponsor of
an urban enterprise zone that imposes conditions for authorization on eligible
business firms under this section shall submit a written report every four
years to the Legislative Assembly concerning the application and effects of the
conditions on business firms within the enterprise zone. [2003 c.662 §32]
Notes of Decisions
Seneca Sustainable Energy, LLC v. Dep't of Revenue, 429 P.3d 360 (Or. 2018).
“The department's overarching contention regarding jurisdiction is that all the claims for relief in Seneca's two complaints were, in actuality, challenges to the validity of a public benefit contribution imposed under ORS 285C.150, insofar as all of Seneca's claims arose out of…”
Seneca Sustainable Energy v. Lane Cnty. Assessor, 21 Or. Tax 366 (Or. T.C. 2014).
“As is allowed by ORS 285C.150, the sponsors of the enterprise zone—the city and county— imposed additional conditions on receipt of enterprise zone exemption, one of which was payment by taxpayer of a pub- lic benefit contribution.”
Hynix Semiconductor v. Lane Cnty. Assessor, No. TC-MD 091320B (Or. T.C. May 12, 2011).
“200; *Page 7 "(d) The qualified business firm fails to meet any condition that the firm is required to satisfy under ORS 285C.150, 285C.155 or 285C.205 or any term of an agreement entered into with the sponsor under ORS 285C.”
Hynix Semicond. Mfg. v. Lane Cnty. Assr., No. TC-MD 091320B (Or. T.C. May 5, 2011).
“200; *Page 7 "(d) The qualified business firm fails to meet any condition that the firm is required to satisfy under ORS 285C.150, 285C.155 or 285C.205 or any term of an agreement entered into with the sponsor under ORS 285C.”
Lowe's HIW Inc. v. Linn Cnty. Assessor, No. TC-MD 130067C (Or. T.C. Jan. 30, 2014).
“ORS 285C.150. There is no evidence in this case as to whether the subject property was completely exempt or had certain “additional conditions” imposed upon it requiring the payment of money to the zone sponsor.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.