Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 285C.150 (2026)

Conditions required by sponsor for authorization; reports

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

285C.150 Conditions required by sponsor for authorization; reports. (1) The sponsor of an urban enterprise zone may require an eligible business firm seeking authorization under ORS 285C.140 to satisfy other conditions in order for the firm to be authorized.

(2) The conditions that a sponsor may impose under this section must be reasonably related to the public purpose of providing opportunities for groups of persons, as defined by the sponsor, to obtain employment, including but not limited to providing training to these groups of persons.

(3) The sponsor may establish procedures for monitoring and verifying compliance with conditions imposed on the firm under this section and require the firm to agree to the procedures as a condition to authorizing the firm.

(4) Conditions established under this section may be imposed on a firm only if the sponsor has adopted a policy that establishes standards for the imposition of the conditions.

(5) Conditions imposed by a sponsor under this section shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, conditions and requirements imposed under ORS 285C.050 to 285C.250 or pursuant to an agreement entered into under ORS 285C.160 and do not affect the duties of the Department of Revenue or of the county assessor under ORS 285C.050 to 285C.250.

(6) A sponsor of an urban enterprise zone that imposes conditions for authorization on eligible business firms under this section shall submit a written report every four years to the Legislative Assembly concerning the application and effects of the conditions on business firms within the enterprise zone. [2003 c.662 §32]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 2011–2018 · leading case: Seneca Sustainable Energy, LLC v. Dep't of Revenue, 429 P.3d 360 (Or. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Seneca Sustainable Energy, LLC v. Dep't of Revenue, 429 P.3d 360 (Or. 2018). “The department's overarching contention regarding jurisdiction is that all the claims for relief in Seneca's two complaints were, in actuality, challenges to the validity of a public benefit contribution imposed under ORS 285C.150, insofar as all of Seneca's claims arose out of…”

Seneca Sustainable Energy v. Lane Cnty. Assessor, 21 Or. Tax 366 (Or. T.C. 2014). “As is allowed by ORS 285C.150, the sponsors of the enterprise zone—the city and county— imposed additional conditions on receipt of enterprise zone exemption, one of which was payment by taxpayer of a pub- lic benefit contribution.”

Seneca Sustainable Energy, LLC v. Lane Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2013). · cites it 2× “) However, pursuant to ORS 285C.150, Plaintiff was required to accept “Additional Conditions Imposed by the Zone Sponsor * * *.”

Hynix Semiconductor v. Lane Cnty. Assessor, Tc-Md 091320b (or.tax 5-12-2011) (Or. T.C. 2011). “200; *Page 7 "(d) The qualified business firm fails to meet any condition that the firm is required to satisfy under ORS 285C.150, 285C.155 or 285C.205 or any term of an agreement entered into with the sponsor under ORS 285C.”

Hynix Semicond. Mfg. v. Lane Cnty. Assr., Tc-Md 091320b (or.tax 5-5-2011) (Or. T.C. 2011). “200; *Page 7 "(d) The qualified business firm fails to meet any condition that the firm is required to satisfy under ORS 285C.150, 285C.155 or 285C.205 or any term of an agreement entered into with the sponsor under ORS 285C.”

Lowe's HIW Inc. v. Linn Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2014). “ORS 285C.150. There is no evidence in this case as to whether the subject property was completely exempt or had certain “additional conditions” imposed upon it requiring the payment of money to the zone sponsor.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.