291.002
Definitions. As
used in ORS 291.001 to 291.034, 291.201 to 291.222, 291.232 to 291.260,
291.261, 291.307 and 291.990, unless the context requires otherwise:
(1) “Classification
of expenditures” means the categories of expenses for the purpose of
budget-making and accounting that are provided in ORS 291.216 (6)(a).
(2) “Dedicated
fund” means a fund in the State Treasury, or a separate account or fund in the
General Fund in the State Treasury, that by law is dedicated, appropriated or
set aside for a limited object or purpose, but “dedicated fund” does not
include a revolving fund or a trust fund.
(3) “Department”
means the Oregon Department of Administrative Services.
(4) “Director”
means the Director of the Oregon Department of Administrative Services.
(5) “Legislatively
adopted budget” means the budget enacted by the Legislative Assembly during an
odd-numbered year regular session for the biennium beginning July 1 of the year
in which the regular session begins.
(6) “Legislatively
approved budget” means the legislatively adopted budget as modified by the
Emergency Board meeting in an interim period or by the Legislative Assembly
meeting in special session or in an even-numbered year regular session.
(7) “Revolving
fund” means a fund in the State Treasury, established by law, from which is
paid the cost of goods or services furnished to or by a state agency, and which
is replenished through charges made for such goods or services or through
transfers from other accounts or funds.
(8) “State agency”
or “agency” means every state officer, board, commission, department,
institution, branch or agency of the state government, whose costs are paid
wholly or in part from funds held in the State Treasury, except:
(a) The
Legislative Assembly, the courts and their officers and committees; and
(b) The Secretary
of State and the State Treasurer in the performance of the duties of their
constitutional offices.
(9) “State
officer” means any elected or appointed state officer, including members of
boards and commissions, except the members and officers of the Legislative
Assembly, the courts, the Secretary of State and the State Treasurer in the
performance of the duties of their constitutional offices.
(10) “Trust fund”
means a fund in the State Treasury in which designated persons or classes of
persons have a vested beneficial interest or equitable ownership, or which was
created or established by a gift, grant, contribution, devise or bequest that
limits the use of the fund to designated objects or purposes. [Amended by 1967
c.419 §2; 2003 c.449 §21; 2003 c.734 §13; 2005 c.837 §8; 2007 c.217 §10; 2011
c.545 §18; 2015 c.767 §89; 2016 c.117 §7; 2023 c.281 §§50,85]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
34
cases, 1967–2015 · leading case:
Johnson v. Emp. Div., 668 P.2d 416 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
Johnson v. Emp. Div., 668 P.2d 416 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 5× ““(2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding brought by a petitioner against a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002, for: “(a) Judicial review of a final order as provided in ORS 183.”
Brown v. Adult & Fam. Servs., 643 P.2d 1266 (Or. 1982).
· cites it 4× “"(2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding brought by a petitioner against a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002, for: "(a) Judicial review of a final order as provided in ORS 183.”
Leo v. Keisling, 986 P.2d 562 (Or. 1999).
· cites it 6× ““(2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding brought by a petitioner against a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002[.]" (Emphasis added.) ORS 246.”
Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 779 P.2d 1028 (Or. 1989).
· cites it 2× “That statute provides: “(1) In any civil judicial proceeding involving as adverse parties a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002, and a petitioner, the court shall award the petitioner reasonable attorney fees and reasonable expenses if the court finds in favor of the…”
TVKO v. Howland, 73 P.3d 905 (Or. 2003).
“090 provides: “(1) In any civil judicial proceeding involving as adverse parties a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002, and a petitioner, the court shall award the petitioner reasonable attorney fees and reasonable expenses if the court finds in favor of the petitioner and…”
Samuel v. Frohnmayer, 770 P.2d 914 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).
· cites it 2× “090 provides: "(1) In any civil judicial proceeding involving as adverse parties a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002, and a petitioner, the court shall award the petitioner reasonable attorney fees and reasonable expenses if the court finds in favor of the petitioner and…”
Kaib's Roving R.Ph. Agency, Inc. v. Emp. Dep't, 77 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 2× “497(2) provides: "The provisions of subsection (1) of this section apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding brought by a petitioner against a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002, for: "(a) Judicial review of a final order as provided in ORS 183.”
Nelson v. Roberts, 789 P.2d 650 (Or. 1990).
· cites it 2× “The significant fiscal effect the measure will have on the state General Fund is reflected in "An Annotation of the Initiative," Section 8.”
Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 730 P.2d 540 (Or. 1986).
““(2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding brought by a petitioner against a state agency, as *368 defined in ORS 291.002, for: “(a) Judicial review of a final order as provided in ORS 183.”
Keeney v. Univ. of Oregon, 36 P.3d 982 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
““(2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding brought by a petitioner against a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002, for: “(a) Judicial review of a final order as provided in ORS 183.”
Enertrol Power Monitoring Corp. v. State, 836 P.2d 123 (Or. 1992).
“” ORS chapter 291 defines “state agency” or “agency” to exclude the Legislative Assembly in general, ORS 291.002(7), then to include “the Legislative Assembly and any of its statutory standing, special or interim committees” in ORS 291.”
State Ex Rel. Pend-Air Citizen's Comm. v. City of Pendleton, 929 P.2d 1044 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
““(2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding brought by a petitioner against a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002, for: “(a) Judicial review of a final order as provided in ORS 183.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 291.002(3) — 1 case
Nelson v. Roberts, 789 P.2d 650 (Or. 1990).
“The significant fiscal effect the measure will have on the state General Fund is reflected in "An Annotation of the Initiative," Section 8.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 291.002(7) — 4 cases
Leo v. Keisling, 986 P.2d 562 (Or. 1999).
““(2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding brought by a petitioner against a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002[.]" (Emphasis added.) ORS 246.”
Johnson v. Emp. Div., 668 P.2d 416 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
““(2) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section apply to an administrative or judicial proceeding brought by a petitioner against a state agency, as defined in ORS 291.002, for: “(a) Judicial review of a final order as provided in ORS 183.”
Enertrol Power Monitoring Corp. v. State, 836 P.2d 123 (Or. 1992).
“” ORS chapter 291 defines “state agency” or “agency” to exclude the Legislative Assembly in general, ORS 291.002(7), then to include “the Legislative Assembly and any of its statutory standing, special or interim committees” in ORS 291.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.