294.520
Priority of appeals under Local Budget Law. The appeal filed with the Oregon Tax Court pursuant
to ORS 294.461, 294.500 and 294.515 shall have priority over all other cases
pending before the Oregon Tax Court and shall be heard and decided as soon
after coming to issue as is reasonably possible. [1963 c.576 §33b]
294.525 [1997 c.308 §2; 1999 c.632 §16;
renumbered 294.346 in 2011]
294.555 [Formerly 294.420; 1965 c.451 §11;
1973 c.333 §1; 1977 c.884 §2; 1985 c.319 §1; 1995 c.79 §104; 1997 c.154 §4;
1997 c.541 §336; 2001 c.135 §27; 2011 c.473 §24; renumbered 294.458 in 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 10 Or. Tax 315 (Or. T.C. 1986).
“” (ORS 294.520.) Accordingly, the court has diligently analyzed the evidence submitted herein and has considered the issues as follows: Constitutionality of ORS 334.”
Dep't of Revenue v. Umatilla Cnty., 10 Or. Tax 309 (Or. T.C. 1983).
“The court heard oral arguments on the motions on November 18, 1986, and has accorded this case priority as directed by ORS 294.520. The facts are undisputed. On May 10, 1986, defendant published a summary of its 1986-1987 proposed budget in the amount of $11,593,788.”
Petersen v. Intermediate Educ. Dist., 7 Or. Tax 460 (Or. T.C. 1978).
“ORS 294.520. The court has been well served by the legal counsel appearing on behalf of the three parties, through the presentation of briefs and oral arguments.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.