Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 305.460 (2026)

Salary, expenses, disability and retirement of judge and magistrates

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      305.460 Salary, expenses, disability and retirement of judge and magistrates. (1) The judge of the tax court shall receive such salary as is provided by law. The presiding magistrate and magistrates of the tax court shall receive such salary as is fixed under the personnel plan established by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court pursuant to ORS 1.008. The judge and magistrates shall receive no other allowances for services except as authorized by this section.

      (2) When the judge or a magistrate of the tax court holds court or performs any other official function away from the state capital, hotel bills and traveling expenses necessarily incurred by the judge or magistrate in the performance of that duty shall be paid by the state. Such expenses are to be paid upon the certificate of the judge or magistrate to the truth of an itemized statement of the expenses. The certificate of expenses is a sufficient voucher upon which the claim shall be paid as provided in ORS 293.295 to 293.462. The Oregon Department of Administrative Services shall draw a warrant upon the State Treasurer for the amount thereof in favor of the tax court judge or magistrate.

      (3) The judge of the Oregon Tax Court shall be subject to the provisions of ORS 1.310 and 238.505 relating to disability and retirement to the same extent and in the same manner as a judge of a circuit court. A tax court magistrate shall be subject to the provisions of law relating to retirement for disability and retirement applicable to a state officer or employee. [1961 c.533 §§4,5; 1977 c.896 §9; 1983 c.740 §85; 1991 c.815 §10; 1995 c.650 §4]

 

      305.465 [1961 c.533 §6; repealed by 1975 c.706 §10]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1964–2014 · leading case: City of Woodburn v. Domogalla, 395 P.2d 150 (Or. 1964).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Woodburn v. Domogalla, 395 P.2d 150 (Or. 1964). · cites it 2× “120 provides: "The circuit court or judge thereof of the county wherein the defendant, if a public officer or body, exercises his or its functions, or if a private person or corporation, wherein such person resides or may be found, or such private corporation might be sued in an…”
Chiles v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2014). “The allowance of reasonable expenses under ORS 305.460(4)(a) is “in addition to costs and disbursements[.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 305.460(4)(a) — 1 case
Chiles v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2014). “The allowance of reasonable expenses under ORS 305.460(4)(a) is “in addition to costs and disbursements[.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.