Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 308.296 (2026)

Penalty for failure to file return reporting only personal property; notice; waiver of penalty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      308.296 Penalty for failure to file return reporting only personal property; notice; waiver of penalty. (1) Each person, business, firm, corporation or association required by ORS 308.290 to file a return reporting only taxable personal property, that has not filed a return within the time fixed in ORS 308.290, shall be subject to a penalty as provided in this section.

      (2) A taxpayer who files a return to which this section applies after March 15, but on or before June 1, is subject to a penalty equal to five percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer.

      (3) A taxpayer who files a return to which this section applies after June 1, but on or before August 1, is subject to a penalty equal to 25 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer.

      (4) A taxpayer who files a return to which this section applies after August 1, or who fails to file a return, shall be subject to a penalty equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer.

      (5) If a delinquency penalty provided in this section is imposed, the tax statement for the year in which the penalty is imposed shall reflect the amount of the penalty and shall constitute notice to the taxpayer.

      (6)(a) Unless the penalty is the subject of an appeal under ORS 311.223, the county property value appeals board, upon application of the taxpayer, may waive the liability:

      (A) For all or a portion of the penalty upon a proper showing of good and sufficient cause; or

      (B) For all of the penalty if the year for which the return was filed was both the first year that a return was required to be filed by the taxpayer and the first year for which the taxpayer filed a return.

      (b) Unless the taxpayer files a timely application in the same manner as an appeal under ORS 309.100, the board may not consider an application made under this subsection.

      (c) An appeal may not be taken from the determination of the board under this subsection.

      (7) If the board waives all or a portion of a penalty already imposed and entered on the roll, the person in charge of the roll shall cancel the waived penalty and enter the cancellation on the roll as an error correction under ORS 311.205 and, if the waived penalty has been paid, it shall be refunded without interest under ORS 311.806.

      (8)(a) Upon application of the taxpayer, the assessor may waive the liability for property tax late filing penalties under this subsection if the taxpayer:

      (A) Has never filed a personal property tax return in this state;

      (B) Has failed to file a property tax return for one or more consecutive years;

      (C) Has not previously received relief from property tax late filing penalties under this subsection; and

      (D) Files an application for relief from property tax late filing penalties that satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b) of this subsection.

      (b) An application for relief from property tax late filing penalties shall include a statement by the taxpayer setting forth the basis for relief from property tax late filing penalties and a statement under oath or affirmation that the basis for relief from property tax late filing penalties as stated in the application is true.

      (c) The county assessor may allow the application for relief from property tax late filing penalties if the assessor finds the reasons given by the taxpayer in the application are sufficient to excuse the failure to file the property tax returns at issue in the application. If the assessor allows the application, the assessor may deny or grant relief from property tax late filing penalties in whole or in part. The determination of the assessor whether to grant the application or deny the application in whole or in part and whether to permit the taxpayer to pay the owing tax penalties, if any, in installments is final. The assessor shall notify the taxpayer of the decision.

      (d) Nothing in this subsection affects the obligation of the taxpayer to file property tax returns or to pay property taxes owing from the current or delinquent tax years. [1997 c.819 §5; 1999 c.655 §1; 2001 c.303 §3; 2001 c.925 §14; 2003 c.63 §3; 2007 c.451 §2; 2007 c.824 §3; 2015 c.38 §4; 2023 c.29 §15]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2023 · leading case: Lakeview Farms, Ltd. v. Dept. of Rev., 21 Or. Tax 161 (Or. T.C. 2013).
Lakeview Farms, Ltd. v. Dept. of Rev., 21 Or. Tax 161 (Or. T.C. 2013). “The penalty for failing to file a personal property tax return is likewise required under ORS 308.296. The statutes in this regard are unambigu- ous and nondiscretionary.”
3D Logics, LLC v. Washington Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2023). · cites it 6× “ANALYSIS The issues are whether late filing penalties were properly imposed upon Plaintiff under ORS 308.296 and, if so, whether Plaintiff made a proper showing of good and sufficient cause under ORS 305.”
Stompbox Music Co. v. Washington Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2019). · cites it 4× “ORS 308.296(2). Taxpayers who file after June 1, but on or before August 1, are subject to a 25 percent penalty.”
Kintz v. Washington Cnty. Assessor, 17 Or. Tax 200 (Or. T.C. 2002). · cites it 6× “Under these circumstances should Washington County be required to impose, for each year, a penalty equal to the tax? That is definitely what the version of ORS 308.296 1 in effect during the time these returns were due dictates.”
Pac. Coast Invest. v. Clatsop Cty. Ass., Tc-Md 100367d (or.tax 3-16-2011) (Or. T.C. 2011). · cites it 4× “Taxpayers who fail "to file a personal property tax return on or before March 1 of any year, * * * shall be jointly and severally subject to the provisons of ORS 308.296." ORS 308.290(1). ORS 308.296(1) provides that a business "required by ORS 308.”
Lardo Bakery, LLC v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2017). · cites it 2× “ORS 308.296(4). Taxpayers who fail to file returns entirely or until after August 1 “shall be subject to a penalty equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer.”
Love Over Gold Inc. v. Marion Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2018). · cites it 2× “ORS 308.296(2). Taxpayers who fail to file returns entirely or until after August 1 “shall be subject to a penalty equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer.”
Ron Staley Enter., Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue, 15 Or. Tax 63 (Or. T.C. 1999). · cites it 5× “ANALYSIS The relevant parts of ORS SOS^OOXa) 1 direct: “* * * Every person and the managing agent or officer of any * * * corporation * * * having in possession or under control taxable personal property shall make a return of the property for ad valorem tax purposes to the…”
Cocina Mexico Lindo v. Washington Cty. Ass., Tc-Md 091420c (or.tax 2-9-2011) (Or. T.C. 2011). · cites it 3× “It appears to the court that those penalties (or lack thereof) were determined in accordance with the provisions of ORS 308.296 in effect for 2004 and 2005 (i.”
Omni-test Labs. Inc. v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2011). · cites it 3× “That statute further provides for the imposition of a penalty under the provisions of ORS 308.296 if the return is not filed by March 1 each year.”
Omni Env't Servs., Inc. v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2011). · cites it 3× “That statute further provides for the imposition of a penalty under the provisions of ORS 308.296 if the return is not filed by March 1 each year.”
Triple P, Inc. v. Douglas Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2015). · cites it 2× “Defendant indicated during the May 13, 2015, hearing that, based on the information Plaintiff provided to this court with the appeal: (1) Defendant will entirely eliminate the tax for the 2013-14 tax year (and the 50-percent penalty Defendant imposed under ORS 308.296(4) for…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 308.296(1) — 2 cases
Pac. Coast Invest. v. Clatsop Cty. Ass., Tc-Md 100367d (or.tax 3-16-2011) (Or. T.C. 2011). “Taxpayers who fail "to file a personal property tax return on or before March 1 of any year, * * * shall be jointly and severally subject to the provisons of ORS 308.296." ORS 308.290(1). ORS 308.296(1) provides that a business "required by ORS 308.”
Cocina Mexico Lindo v. Washington Cty. Ass., Tc-Md 091420c (or.tax 2-9-2011) (Or. T.C. 2011). “It appears to the court that those penalties (or lack thereof) were determined in accordance with the provisions of ORS 308.296 in effect for 2004 and 2005 (i.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 308.296(2) — 6 cases
Love Over Gold Inc. v. Marion Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2018). “ORS 308.296(2). Taxpayers who fail to file returns entirely or until after August 1 “shall be subject to a penalty equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer.”
Stompbox Music Co. v. Washington Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2019). “ORS 308.296(2). Taxpayers who file after June 1, but on or before August 1, are subject to a 25 percent penalty.”
3D Logics, LLC v. Washington Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2023). “ANALYSIS The issues are whether late filing penalties were properly imposed upon Plaintiff under ORS 308.296 and, if so, whether Plaintiff made a proper showing of good and sufficient cause under ORS 305.”
Cocina Mexico Lindo v. Washington Cty. Ass., Tc-Md 091420c (or.tax 2-9-2011) (Or. T.C. 2011). “It appears to the court that those penalties (or lack thereof) were determined in accordance with the provisions of ORS 308.296 in effect for 2004 and 2005 (i.”
Omni-test Labs. Inc. v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2011). “That statute further provides for the imposition of a penalty under the provisions of ORS 308.296 if the return is not filed by March 1 each year.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 308.296(4) — 10 cases
Lardo Bakery, LLC v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2017). “ORS 308.296(4). Taxpayers who fail to file returns entirely or until after August 1 “shall be subject to a penalty equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer.”
3D Logics, LLC v. Washington Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2023). “ANALYSIS The issues are whether late filing penalties were properly imposed upon Plaintiff under ORS 308.296 and, if so, whether Plaintiff made a proper showing of good and sufficient cause under ORS 305.”
Pac. Coast Invest. v. Clatsop Cty. Ass., Tc-Md 100367d (or.tax 3-16-2011) (Or. T.C. 2011). “Taxpayers who fail "to file a personal property tax return on or before March 1 of any year, * * * shall be jointly and severally subject to the provisons of ORS 308.296." ORS 308.290(1). ORS 308.296(1) provides that a business "required by ORS 308.”
Triple P, Inc. v. Douglas Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2015). “Defendant indicated during the May 13, 2015, hearing that, based on the information Plaintiff provided to this court with the appeal: (1) Defendant will entirely eliminate the tax for the 2013-14 tax year (and the 50-percent penalty Defendant imposed under ORS 308.296(4) for…”
Love Over Gold Inc. v. Marion Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2018). “ORS 308.296(2). Taxpayers who fail to file returns entirely or until after August 1 “shall be subject to a penalty equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 308.296(6) — 1 case
3D Logics, LLC v. Washington Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2023). “ANALYSIS The issues are whether late filing penalties were properly imposed upon Plaintiff under ORS 308.296 and, if so, whether Plaintiff made a proper showing of good and sufficient cause under ORS 305.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 308.296(8) — 2 cases
Stompbox Music Co. v. Washington Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2019). “ORS 308.296(2). Taxpayers who file after June 1, but on or before August 1, are subject to a 25 percent penalty.”
3D Logics, LLC v. Washington Cnty. Assessor (Or. T.C. 2023). “ANALYSIS The issues are whether late filing penalties were properly imposed upon Plaintiff under ORS 308.296 and, if so, whether Plaintiff made a proper showing of good and sufficient cause under ORS 305.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.