Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 311.812 (2026)

No interest on refunds under ORS 311.806; exceptions; rate

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      311.812 No interest on refunds under ORS 311.806; exceptions; rate. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, interest may not be paid upon any tax refunds made under ORS 311.806.

      (2) Interest as provided in subsection (3) of this section shall be paid on the following refunds:

      (a) A refund resulting from the correction under ORS 308.242 (2) or (3) or 311.205 of an error made by the assessor, Department of Revenue or tax collector.

      (b) A refund resulting from a written stipulation of the county assessor or the county tax collector if the written stipulation constitutes a final determination that is not subject to appeal.

      (c) Any refund ordered by the Department of Revenue if no appeal is taken or can be taken from the department’s order.

      (d) Refunds ordered by the Oregon Tax Court or the Supreme Court if the order constitutes a final determination of the matter.

      (e) Refunds of taxes collected against real or personal property not within the jurisdiction of the tax levying body.

      (f) Refunds due to reductions in value ordered by a county property value appeals board where no appeal is taken.

      (g) Refunds due to reductions in value made pursuant to ORS 309.115.

      (h) Refunds due to a claim for a veteran’s exemption for a prior tax year that is filed pursuant to ORS 307.262.

      (3)(a) The interest provided by subsection (2) of this section shall be paid at the rate of one percent per month, or fraction of a month, computed from the time the tax was paid or from the time the first installment thereof was due, whichever is the later. If a discount is given at the time the taxes are paid, interest shall be computed only on the net amount of taxes to be refunded. If any portion of a refund described in subsection (2) of this section results from an assessment based on inaccurate information contained in a report filed by a taxpayer, interest shall be computed on only the portion of the refund that is not attributable to the inaccurate information contained in the taxpayer report.

      (b) As used in this subsection, “report” means a return, statement or any other information provided by a taxpayer in writing to the department or county assessor. [1971 c.737 §2; 1975 c.704 §4; 1977 c.606 §3; 1981 c.804 §89a; 1983 s.s. c.5 §22; 1993 c.270 §61; 1995 c.79 §151; 1995 c.226 §13; 1997 c.541 §298; 1999 c.862 §5; 2001 c.199 §4; 2005 c.394 §2; 2007 c.545 §1; 2007 c.590 §3; 2009 c.41 §5; 2023 c.29 §37]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1972–2025 · leading case: Allen v. Dep't of Revenue, 17 Or. Tax 248 (Or. T.C. 2003).
Allen v. Dep't of Revenue, 17 Or. Tax 248 (Or. T.C. 2003). “The county shall correct the assessment and tax rolls to reflect the above stated RMV of taxpayers’ property as defined in ORS 308.”
Parr v. Dep't of Revenue, 553 P.2d 1051 (Or. 1976). · cites it 2× “Yet, if this same maxim were applied to construe ORS 311.812(3), the same language would have to be interpreted as providing for each fraction of a month to be rounded up to a full month.”
Rosboro Lumber Co. v. Heine, 618 P.2d 960 (Or. 1980). · cites it 2× “385, taxes collected by an assessor or tax collector pursuant to a levy of the assessor or of any taxing district or tax levying body plus interest thereon as provided in ORS 311.812, in the following cases: "(a) Whenever ordered by the Department of Revenue and no appeal is…”
Portland Gen. Elec. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 7 Or. Tax 444 (Or. T.C. 1978). · cites it 3× “The statute directs that interest is to be "computed from the time the tax was paid” (but not for any *446 period prior to the due date of the first instalment).”
Smith v. Multnomah Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 865 P.2d 356 (Or. 1994). “255, plus interest thereon as provided in ORS 311.812, in the following cases: f(* ,1: * ,1: * “(c) Whenever any person, through excusable neglect, or through error subject to correction under ORS 311.”
Dennehy v. Dep't of Revenue, 781 P.2d 346 (Or. 1989). “The request of the department shall be considered an order for the purpose of ORS 311.812(2)(b).” This is not a case in which either (1) the Director has “requested,” or (2) the tax collector has approved such a refund.”
Dennehy v. Dep't of Revenue, 668 P.2d 1210 (Or. 1983). “385, taxes collected by an assessor or tax collector pursuant to a levy of the assessor or of any taxing district or tax levying body plus interest thereon as provided in ORS 311.812, in the following cases: *577 “(a) Whenever ordered by the Department of Revenue and no appeal…”
Rosboro Lbr. Co. v. Heine, 618 P.2d 960 (Or. 1980). · cites it 2× “385, taxes collected by an assessor or tax collector pursuant to a levy of the assessor or of any taxing district or tax levying body plus interest thereon as provided in ORS 311.812, in the following cases: "(a) Whenever ordered by the Department of Revenue and no appeal is…”
Kailes v. Josephine Cnty. Assessor, 16 Or. Tax 348 (Or. T.C. 2001). “806 and ORS 311.812. The account number in tax year 1996-97 was 303-698-83.”
Charter Commc'ns Holding Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 24 Or. Tax 88 (Or. T.C. 2020). “The court declines to treat this argument as a prudential consideration. The legislature in 2005 made clear its concern about the costs to local government of lengthy appeal processes in industrial property and central assessment cases.”
Rosboro Lumber Co. v. Heine, 8 Or. Tax 221 (Or. T.C. 1979). “806, the pertinent parts of which read: "(1) The county court shall refund to a taxpayer, out of the general fund, taxes collected by an assessor or tax collector pursuant to a levy of the assessor or of any taxing district or tax levying body plus interest thereon as provided…”
Shields v. Dep't of Revenue, 5 Or. Tax 160 (Or. T.C. 1972). “The Director of the Department of Assessment and Taxation of Lane County is directed to amend the assessment and tax rolls for 1970-1971 accordingly and the County Commissioners of Lane County, Oregon, are directed to refund to plaintiffs any taxes paid for tax year 1970-1971,…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 311.812(2) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 311.812(2)(b) — 1 case
Dennehy v. Dep't of Revenue, 781 P.2d 346 (Or. 1989). “The request of the department shall be considered an order for the purpose of ORS 311.812(2)(b).” This is not a case in which either (1) the Director has “requested,” or (2) the tax collector has approved such a refund.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 311.812(2)(c) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 311.812(2)(d) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 311.812(3) — 3 cases
Parr v. Dep't of Revenue, 553 P.2d 1051 (Or. 1976). “Yet, if this same maxim were applied to construe ORS 311.812(3), the same language would have to be interpreted as providing for each fraction of a month to be rounded up to a full month.”
Portland Gen. Elec. Co. v. Dep't of Revenue, 7 Or. Tax 444 (Or. T.C. 1978). “The statute directs that interest is to be "computed from the time the tax was paid” (but not for any *446 period prior to the due date of the first instalment).”
Parr v. Dep't of Revenue, 6 Or. Tax 259 (Or. T.C. 1975).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 311.812(3)(a) — 1 case
Charter Commc'ns Holding Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 24 Or. Tax 88 (Or. T.C. 2020). “The court declines to treat this argument as a prudential consideration. The legislature in 2005 made clear its concern about the costs to local government of lengthy appeal processes in industrial property and central assessment cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.