Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 334.025 (2026)

Number of board members; election; local advisory committees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      334.025 Number of board members; election; local advisory committees. Except as provided in ORS 255.400 to 255.424:

      (1) The board of directors of an education service district shall consist of seven, nine or 11 members.

      (2) In education service districts, not fewer than five of the directors shall be elected, one from each of the zones established under ORS 334.032. At the discretion of the board of directors, one or two board members may be elected from the district at large.

      (3) On the petition of two component school districts, the board shall establish local advisory committees to represent the interests of areas within the petitioning districts. The local advisory committees shall advise the board on matters of concern within the advisory committee’s area. Local advisory committees shall represent two or more component school districts.

      (4) The board of directors may by resolution increase or decrease the number of members of the board. The board’s resolution shall be entered with sufficient time for the board to give the required information to the elections officer under ORS 255.069, and the board’s resolution shall have no effect on the terms of any current board members. [1957 c.678 §4; 1961 c.323 §1; 1965 c.100 §172; 1981 c.131 §1; 1993 c.784 §4; 1995 c.611 §7; 2001 c.518 §3; 2019 c.449 §18]

 

      334.030 [Repealed by 1957 c.678 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–1988 · leading case: Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 754 P.2d 891 (Or. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 754 P.2d 891 (Or. 1988). · cites it 11× “SPECIFIC GRANT Chapter 334 (establishing ESDs) does not specifically grant jurisdiction to the Tax Court to determine the validity (constitutional or otherwise) of ORS 334.025(3).”
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 10 Or. Tax 315 (Or. T.C. 1986). · cites it 4× “(ORS 334.025.) The board of directors gives general direction and policy to the district.”
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 754 P.2d 903 (Or. 1988). · cites it 2× “Constitutionality of ORS 334.025(3) and 334.240(1). Plaintiffs allege that the structures of defendant’s board of directors under ORS 334.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 334.025(1) — 1 case
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 754 P.2d 891 (Or. 1988). “SPECIFIC GRANT Chapter 334 (establishing ESDs) does not specifically grant jurisdiction to the Tax Court to determine the validity (constitutional or otherwise) of ORS 334.025(3).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 334.025(3) — 3 cases
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 754 P.2d 891 (Or. 1988). “SPECIFIC GRANT Chapter 334 (establishing ESDs) does not specifically grant jurisdiction to the Tax Court to determine the validity (constitutional or otherwise) of ORS 334.025(3).”
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 10 Or. Tax 315 (Or. T.C. 1986). “(ORS 334.025.) The board of directors gives general direction and policy to the district.”
Gugler v. Baker Cnty. Educ. Serv. Dist., 754 P.2d 903 (Or. 1988). “Constitutionality of ORS 334.025(3) and 334.240(1). Plaintiffs allege that the structures of defendant’s board of directors under ORS 334.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.