Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 345.240 (2026)

Discrimination prohibited; complaint

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      345.240 Discrimination prohibited; complaint. (1) No career school licensed under ORS 345.010 to 345.340 shall refuse admission to or discriminate in admission against or discriminate in giving instruction to any person otherwise qualified.

      (2) Any violation of this section is an unlawful practice under ORS chapter 659A. Any person unlawfully discriminated against under this section may file a complaint under ORS 659A.820 with the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries.

      (3) A certified copy of a finding by the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries under ORS 659A.850 that the school has violated this section shall be adequate proof of the violation.

      (4) As used in this section, “discriminate” has the meaning given “discrimination” in ORS 659.850. [Amended by 1957 c.724 §11; 1973 c.714 §4; 1989 c.333 §14; 1993 c.45 §266; 1995 c.343 §13; 2001 c.621 §77]

 

      345.250 [Amended by 1957 c.724 §12; repealed by 1989 c.333 §26]

 

      345.310 [1965 c.529 §2; repealed by 1975 c.478 §29]

 

STANDARDS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1976–1980 · leading case: Gaudry v. Bureau of Labor & Indus., 617 P.2d 668 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gaudry v. Bureau of Labor & Indus., 617 P.2d 668 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “685 or- any person claiming to be aggrieved by a violation of ORS 345.240 or any person claiming to be aggrieved by a violation of ORS 659.”
Carlson v. Bureau of Labor, 545 P.2d 620 (Or. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “675 or by any person acting on behalf of such place or any person claiming to be aggrieved by a violation of ORS 345.240 or any person claiming to be aggrieved by a violation of ORS 659.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.