Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 368.351

Vacation without hearing

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      368.351 Vacation without hearing. A county governing body may make a determination about a vacation of property under ORS 368.326 to 368.366 without complying with ORS 368.346 if the proceedings for vacation were initiated by a petition under ORS 368.341 that indicates the owners’ approval of the proposed vacation and that contains the acknowledged signatures of owners of 100 percent of private property proposed to be vacated and acknowledged signatures of owners of 100 percent of property abutting public property proposed to be vacated and either:

      (1) The county road official files with the county governing body a written report that contains the county road official’s assessment that any vacation of public property is in the public interest; or

      (2) The planning director of the county files a written report with the county governing body in which the planning director, upon review, finds that an interior lot line vacation affecting private property complies with applicable land use regulations and facilitates development of the property subject to interior lot line vacation. [1981 c.153 §39; 2005 c.762 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–1988 · leading case: Harding v. Clackamas County
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harding v. Clackamas County (1988) orctapp · cites it 23× “2 The county followed the summary vacation procedures of ORS 368.351, rather than the procedures of ORS 368.”
Billington v. Polk County (1985) or “ORS 368.351 (vacation without hearing). 5 The county surveyor is the county’s road officer.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 368.351(1) — 1 case
Harding v. Clackamas County (1988) orctapp “2 The county followed the summary vacation procedures of ORS 368.351, rather than the procedures of ORS 368.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 368.351(2) — 1 case
Harding v. Clackamas County (1988) orctapp “2 The county followed the summary vacation procedures of ORS 368.351, rather than the procedures of ORS 368.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.