Or. Rev. Stat. § 377.700

Short title

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      377.700 Short title. ORS 377.700 to 377.844 and 377.992 shall be known and may be cited as the Oregon Motorist Information Act of 1971. [1971 c.770 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1975–2020 · leading case: Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State (2001) or · cites it 3× “ORS 377.700 to ORS 377.840; ORS 377.992. Plaintiff contends that the OMIA, which regulates signs along Oregon highways, violates the free speech provisions of both the state and federal constitutions.”
Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Department of Transportation (2006) or · cites it 2× “]" In these five consolidated cases, we consider the relationship between that provision and the state's regulation of signs along highways under the Oregon Motorist Information Act, ORS 377.700 to 377.840 and ORS 377.992 (1999) (OMIA).”
Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State (1997) orctapp · cites it 4× “ORS 377.700 to 377.840 and ORS 377.992. The OMIA generally prohibits the installation or maintenance of any “outdoor advertising sign” or any “directional sign” visible to motorists traveling on state highways, unless it complies with the OMIA, state administrative rules and…”
Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Branch (2002) orctapp · cites it 2× “Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Department of Transportation, Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Branch (department), to remove a billboard along a state highway, pursuant to the Oregon Motorist Information Act (Act), ORS 377.”
Van v. Travel Information Council (1981) orctapp · cites it 2× “ORS 377.700 to 377.840 and 377.992. That Act was enacted in response to the 1965 federal Highway Beautification Act.”
Scenic America, Inc. v. United States Department of Transportation (2013) dcd “(The Arkansas Highway Beautification Act); Or.Rev.Stat. § 377.700 et seq. (The Oregon Motorist Information Act); Ariz.”
Sachdev v. Or. Med. Bd. (2018) orctapp “415(3)(c) requires a "reference to the particular sections of the statutes and rules involved .”
Lombardo v. Warner (2006) or “The certified questions ask us to interpret the provisions for obtaining a variance under the Oregon Motorist Information Act (OMIA), ORS 377.700 to 377.840, from otherwise applicable restrictions on the display of temporary signs visible from public highways.”
Drayton v. Department of Transportation (2003) orctapp “In these consolidated cases, petitioner seeks judicial review of three final orders of the Oregon Department of Transportation (department) requiring him to remove outdoor advertising signs that the department concluded do not comply with the Oregon Motorist Information Act…”
Scenic America, Inc. v. United States Department of Transportation (2014) dcd “(The Arkansas Highway Beautification Act); Or. Rev. Stat. § 377.700 et seq. (The Oregon Motorist Information Act); Ariz.”
Media Art Co. v. City of Gates (1999) orctapp ““Off-premise advertising signs along state highways are regulated under the Oregon Motorist Information Act (OMIA), codified at ORS 377.700 to 377.840. The OMIA generally prohibits the installation of any off-premise outdoor advertising sign visible to motorists traveling on the…”
Herson v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Branch (1998) orctapp “The order arises from the Oregon Motorist Information Act (Act), ORS 377.700 et seq., which regulates billboards along state highways, and was issued following a contested case hearing conducted by ODOT, pursuant to ORS 377.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.