377.712
Issuance of permits for certain preexisting signs. (1) Notwithstanding the provisions
of ORS 377.700 to 377.780, the owner of any outdoor advertising sign in
existence on May 30, 2007, located in a commercial or industrial zone in
existence on May 30, 2007, that meets all requirements for obtaining an outdoor
advertising sign permit as set out in ORS 377.700 to 377.780 and for which the
owner had not secured an outdoor advertising permit as required by ORS 377.725
prior to May 30, 2007, either because of ignorance of the requirements of ORS
377.725 or because the area, road or street adjacent to which the sign was
situated was not, at that time, designated as a state highway, shall be
entitled to the issuance of an outdoor advertising sign permit by the
Department of Transportation upon application by the owner of the sign and the
payment of the fee established by the department under ORS 377.729.
(2)
Notwithstanding the provisions of ORS 377.700 to 377.780, the owner of any
outdoor advertising sign visible from a road or street that is designated as a
state highway after May 30, 2007, is entitled to the issuance of an outdoor
advertising sign permit for the sign upon application by the owner of the sign,
payment of the fee established by the department under ORS 377.729 and receipt
of the affidavit required under ORS 377.723, if the sign was lawfully located
within a commercial or industrial zone at the time of designation as a state
highway. [1977 c.265 §7; 1993 c.376 §1; 2001 c.104 §127; 2001 c.750 §4; 2007
c.199 §6]
Note: 377.712 was enacted into law by
the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of any series in
ORS chapter 377 by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes
for further explanation.
Notes of Decisions
Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State, 20 P.3d 180 (Or. 2001).
“The exception to the OMIA’s general prohibition against outdoor advertising signs applies to outdoor advertising signs that existed before June 12,1975, in commercial or industrial zones.”
Drayton v. Dep't of Transp., 62 P.3d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
“Exceptions to the general prohibition include certain signs that existed on or before June 12,1975, ORS 377.712(1), signs “of a governmental unit,” ORS 377.”
Jim A. Atwood Trust v. ODOT, 341 Or. App. 417 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 4× “762; see also ORS 377.712 (setting out requirements for a preexisting, nonconforming OAS).”
Jim A. Atwood Trust v. ODOT, 341 Or. App. 417 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 4× “762; see also ORS 377.712 (setting out requirements for a preexisting, nonconforming OAS).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 377.712(1) — 5 cases
Drayton v. Dep't of Transp., 62 P.3d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
“Exceptions to the general prohibition include certain signs that existed on or before June 12,1975, ORS 377.712(1), signs “of a governmental unit,” ORS 377.”
Jim A. Atwood Trust v. ODOT, 341 Or. App. 417 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“762; see also ORS 377.712 (setting out requirements for a preexisting, nonconforming OAS).”
Jim A. Atwood Trust v. ODOT, 341 Or. App. 417 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“762; see also ORS 377.712 (setting out requirements for a preexisting, nonconforming OAS).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 377.712(2) — 2 cases
Jim A. Atwood Trust v. ODOT, 341 Or. App. 417 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“762; see also ORS 377.712 (setting out requirements for a preexisting, nonconforming OAS).”
Jim A. Atwood Trust v. ODOT, 341 Or. App. 417 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“762; see also ORS 377.712 (setting out requirements for a preexisting, nonconforming OAS).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.