Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.473 (2026)

Notice; appearance

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      419B.473 Notice; appearance. (1) The court may order that the child or ward or any other person be present during the hearing.

      (2) The court shall notify the parties listed in ORS 419B.470 and any other interested parties of the hearing. The notice shall state the time and place of the hearing. Upon request of the court, the Department of Human Services or other legal custodian of the child or ward shall provide the court with information concerning the whereabouts and identity of such parties. [1993 c.33 §136; 2003 c.396 §80]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: State ex rel. Juv. Dep't v. Risland, 51 P.3d 697 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Juv. Dep't v. Risland, 51 P.3d 697 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “ORS 419B.473. Although ORS 419B.470(4) authorized the court on its “own motion” to conduct a permanency hearing at “any time,” the December 20 hearing was not such a proceeding.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. C., 310 Or. App. 389 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “, 304 Or App 542, 543 , 466 P3d 716 (2020) (“[T]he court erred because it did not provide any type of notice of the permanency hearing to mother as it was required to do under ORS 419B.473(2).”). However, those cases, which did not interpret ORS 419B.”
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. Risland, 51 P.3d 697 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “ORS 419B.473. Although ORS 419B.470(4) authorized the court on its "own motion" to conduct a permanency hearing at "any time," the December 20 hearing was not such a proceeding.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. G. S., 466 P.3d 716 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “In her first assignment of error, she claims that the court erred by holding the permanency hearing without providing her the statutorily required notice under ORS 419B.473(2), which requires a court to provide notice of the time and place of the permanency hear- ing to a parent…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (2025). “ORS 419B.473 (requiring that notice of permanency hearing be provided to parties listed in ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. M. G. J., 374 Or. 228 (2025). “ORS 419B.473 (requiring that notice of permanency hearing be provided to parties listed in ORS 419B.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.473(2): 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. C., 310 Or. App. 389 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “, 304 Or App 542, 543 , 466 P3d 716 (2020) (“[T]he court erred because it did not provide any type of notice of the permanency hearing to mother as it was required to do under ORS 419B.473(2).”). However, those cases, which did not interpret ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. G. S., 466 P.3d 716 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “In her first assignment of error, she claims that the court erred by holding the permanency hearing without providing her the statutorily required notice under ORS 419B.473(2), which requires a court to provide notice of the time and place of the permanency hear- ing to a parent…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.