Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.533 (2026)

Rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      419C.533 Rules. (1) The Psychiatric Security Review Board, by rule pursuant to ORS 183.325 to 183.410 and not inconsistent with law, may implement its policies and set out its procedure and practice requirements and may promulgate such interpretive rules as the board deems necessary or appropriate to carry out its statutory responsibilities.

      (2) The Psychiatric Security Review Board shall adopt rules defining the type of dangerous behavior that requires the temporary placement of a young person with mental retardation in a secure hospital or facility.

      (3) The Psychiatric Security Review Board shall consult with the Department of Human Services about proposed rules relating to developmental disabilities and the Oregon Health Authority about proposed rules relating to mental illness before issuing proposed rules for public comment and before adopting rules under this section. [2007 c.889 §6; 2009 c.595 §372; 2025 c.56 §6]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: State v. J. C. N.-V., 380 P.3d 248 (Or. 2016).
State v. J. C. N.-V., 380 P.3d 248 (Or. 2016). “In 1985, the statute was codified as ORS 419C.533(l)(c). We generally use the term “waiver” in lieu of the term “remand.”
State v. J. C. N.-V. (Or. 2016). “90 In 1985, the statute was codified as ORS 419C.533(1)(c). 10 We generally use the term “waiver” in lieu of the term “remand.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.533(1)(c) — 1 case
State v. J. C. N.-V. (Or. 2016). “90 In 1985, the statute was codified as ORS 419C.533(1)(c). 10 We generally use the term “waiver” in lieu of the term “remand.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.533(l)(c) — 1 case
State v. J. C. N.-V., 380 P.3d 248 (Or. 2016). “In 1985, the statute was codified as ORS 419C.533(l)(c). We generally use the term “waiver” in lieu of the term “remand.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.