Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.620 (2026)

Circumstances requiring report

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      419C.620 Circumstances requiring report. (1) When required by the court, the Oregon Youth Authority or a private agency having guardianship or legal custody of an adjudicated youth pursuant to court order shall file reports on the adjudicated youth with the juvenile court that entered the original order concerning the adjudicated youth.

      (2) A county juvenile department shall file a report with the juvenile court under this section if an adjudicated youth remains under juvenile department care for six consecutive months from the date of initial placement and:

      (a) The county juvenile department is a county program, as defined in ORS 418.205;

      (b) The county juvenile department is participating in programs related to Title IV-E of the Social Security Act;

      (c) The county juvenile department has responsibility for the care and placement of the adjudicated youth; and

      (d) The placement is not a detention facility. [1993 c.33 §263; 1999 c.92 §2; 2005 c.159 §5; 2019 c.513 §3; 2021 c.489 §105]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2016 · leading case: Smith v. Jester, 228 P.3d 1232 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. Jester, 228 P.3d 1232 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “053(1) (limiting the transferability of a *636 juvenile proceeding where a youth offender has been adjudicated within the jurisdiction of the court); ORS 419C.620 (“[T]he Oregon Youth Authority or a private agency having guardianship or legal custody of a youth offender pursuant…”
State v. D. J., 384 P.3d 164 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). “” ORS 419C.620. Following receipt of a report, and if requested by the youth’s attorney, among others, the court shall hold a hearing “to review the youth offender’s condition and circumstances and to determine if the court should * * * order modifications in the custody,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.