Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 421.194 (2026)
Disciplinary orders not subject to judicial review
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
421.194 Disciplinary orders not subject to judicial review. (1) Disciplinary orders of the Department of Corrections issued under procedures adopted pursuant to ORS 421.180 are not subject to judicial review by any court of this state.
(2) This section does not affect any right that an adult in custody may have to prosecute a writ of habeas corpus. [1995 c.108 §2; 2019 c.213 §78]
421.195 [1973 c.621 §7; 1977 c.323 §1; 1977 c.374 §4; 1983 c.740 §144; 1987 c.320 §180; repealed by 1995 c.108 §5]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2002–2007 · leading case: State ex rel. Osborne v. Cook, 59 P.3d 531 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
State ex rel. Osborne v. Cook, 59 P.3d 531 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “First, defendant asserted that, under ORS 421.194, mandamus was not available: “Unless a disciplinary order encroaches upon an inmate’s constitutional rights, ORS 421.”
Hessel v. Hill, 155 P.3d 877 (Or. Ct. App. 2007). “ORS 421.194; see also Shelby v. Board of Parole, 140 Or App 102 , 915 P2d 414 , rev den, 324 Or 18 (1996).”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 421.194(1): 1 case
State ex rel. Osborne v. Cook, 59 P.3d 531 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “First, defendant asserted that, under ORS 421.194, mandamus was not available: “Unless a disciplinary order encroaches upon an inmate’s constitutional rights, ORS 421.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 421.194(2): 1 case
State ex rel. Osborne v. Cook, 59 P.3d 531 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “First, defendant asserted that, under ORS 421.194, mandamus was not available: “Unless a disciplinary order encroaches upon an inmate’s constitutional rights, ORS 421.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.