Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 426.500 (2026)

Powers and duties of Oregon Health Authority; rules

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      426.500 Powers and duties of Oregon Health Authority; rules. For the purpose of carrying out the policy and intent of ORS 426.490 to 426.500, the Oregon Health Authority shall:

      (1) Adopt rules for the administration of ORS 426.490 to 426.500;

      (2) Prepare a written discharge plan for each person with a chronic mental illness who is a patient at a state hospital or who is committed to the authority pursuant to ORS 426.005 to 426.223 and 426.273 to 426.380;

      (3) Ensure that case managers are provided for each person with a chronic mental illness described in subsection (2) of this section; and

      (4) Disburse from any available funds:

      (a) Funds for one LINC model in the area served by F. H. Dammasch State Hospital and one LINC model in the area served by the Oregon State Hospital licensed under ORS 443.415;

      (b) Discretionary funds for services necessary to implement a discharge plan, including but not limited to transportation, medication, recreation and socialization; and

      (c) Funds to provide day treatment services, community psychiatric inpatient services, and work activity services for persons with chronic mental illness when needed. [1979 c.784 §3; 1999 c.59 §121; 2007 c.70 §209; 2009 c.595 §428; 2013 c.360 §67]

 

      Note: See note under 426.490.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1994–1994 · leading case: State v. Herdan, 882 P.2d 606 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Herdan, 882 P.2d 606 (Or. Ct. App. 1994). “005(2) because it did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself or that he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 426.500(2)(b): 1 case
State v. Herdan, 882 P.2d 606 (Or. Ct. App. 1994). “005(2) because it did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself or that he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.