Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 431A.260 (2026)

Requirement to remove or substitute high priority chemicals of concern; waivers; exemptions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      431A.260 Requirement to remove or substitute high priority chemicals of concern; waivers; exemptions. (1) On or before the date on which a manufacturer of a children’s product submits the third biennial notice required under ORS 431A.258 for a chemical that is present in a children’s product, the manufacturer must remove or make a substitution for the chemical pursuant to ORS 431A.263, or seek a waiver under ORS 431A.265, if the chemical is present in a children’s product that is:

      (a) Mouthable;

      (b) A children’s cosmetic; or

      (c) Made for, marketed for use by or marketed to children under three years of age.

      (2) A manufacturer with 25 or fewer employees may apply for a two-year extension of the date specified in subsection (1) of this section to meet the requirements of this section.

      (3) Manufacturers are exempt from meeting the requirements of this section for children’s products described in subsection (1) of this section that contain high priority chemicals of concern for children’s health used in children’s products at levels that are at or below allowable levels for children’s products as established by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, P.L. 110-314, 122 Stat. 3016, as in effect on July 27, 2015.

      (4)(a) The Oregon Health Authority shall adopt rules providing for additional exemptions from the requirements of this section.

      (b) For purposes of this subsection, any consumer product safety standard adopted under federal law that establishes allowable levels for children’s products of a high priority chemical of concern for children’s health used in children’s products is presumed to establish the maximum allowable level of the chemical that may be used in children’s products that are sold or offered for sale in this state. The authority may not require a manufacturer in compliance with the federal standard to also comply with the provisions of this section unless the authority establishes in the rulemaking process that a lower maximum allowable level for children’s products of a high priority chemical of concern for children’s health used in children’s products than the allowable level set by the federal standard is necessary to protect human health and welfare. [2015 c.786 §5]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: Am. Apparel & Footwear Ass'n, Inc. v. Schroeder (D. Or. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Am. Apparel & Footwear Ass'n, Inc. v. Schroeder (D. Or. 2022). · cites it 19× “The third is ORS § 431A.260 (the Removal Statute). Each is separately described below.”
Am. Apparel & Footwear Ass'n, Inc. v. Dave Baden, 107 F.4th 934 (9th Cir. 2024). “” Or. Rev. Stat. § 431A.260(1). However, the TFKA and its regulations create carve-outs that allow manufacturers to be exempt from meeting the requirement of removal or substitution of HPCCCH.”
Am. Apparel & Footwear Ass'n, Inc. v. Schroeder (D. Or. 2023). · cites it 2× “State Law Claim In their state law claim, Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the OHA exceeded its authority when it adopted the Exemption Regulation because the regulation’s documentation and fee requirements add burdens not required under the Removal Statute, ORS § 431A.260. On…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 431A.260(1) — 2 cases
Am. Apparel & Footwear Ass'n, Inc. v. Dave Baden, 107 F.4th 934 (9th Cir. 2024). “” Or. Rev. Stat. § 431A.260(1). However, the TFKA and its regulations create carve-outs that allow manufacturers to be exempt from meeting the requirement of removal or substitution of HPCCCH.”
Am. Apparel & Footwear Ass'n, Inc. v. Schroeder (D. Or. 2022). “The third is ORS § 431A.260 (the Removal Statute). Each is separately described below.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 431A.260(3) — 1 case
Am. Apparel & Footwear Ass'n, Inc. v. Schroeder (D. Or. 2022). “The third is ORS § 431A.260 (the Removal Statute). Each is separately described below.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 431A.260(4)(a) — 1 case
Am. Apparel & Footwear Ass'n, Inc. v. Schroeder (D. Or. 2022). “The third is ORS § 431A.260 (the Removal Statute). Each is separately described below.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 431A.260(4)(b) — 1 case
Am. Apparel & Footwear Ass'n, Inc. v. Schroeder (D. Or. 2022). “The third is ORS § 431A.260 (the Removal Statute). Each is separately described below.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.