433.416 When
employer to provide preventive immunization. (1) An employer of a health care worker at risk of
contracting an infectious disease in the course of employment shall provide to
the worker preventive immunization for infectious disease if such preventive
immunization is available and is medically appropriate.
(2) Such
preventive immunization shall be provided by the employer at no cost to the
worker.
(3) A worker
shall not be required as a condition of work to be immunized under this
section, unless such immunization is otherwise required by federal or state
law, rule or regulation. [1989 c.949 §3]
Note: See note under 433.407.
Notes of Decisions
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth., 541 P.3d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 8× “180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth., 541 P.3d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 8× “180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 433.416(1): 2 cases
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth., 541 P.3d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth., 541 P.3d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 433.416(3): 2 cases
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth., 541 P.3d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth., 541 P.3d 897 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
“180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.