Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 433.416 (2026)

When employer to provide preventive immunization

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      433.416 When employer to provide preventive immunization. (1) An employer of a health care worker at risk of contracting an infectious disease in the course of employment shall provide to the worker preventive immunization for infectious disease if such preventive immunization is available and is medically appropriate.

      (2) Such preventive immunization shall be provided by the employer at no cost to the worker.

      (3) A worker shall not be required as a condition of work to be immunized under this section, unless such immunization is otherwise required by federal or state law, rule or regulation. [1989 c.949 §3]

 

      Note: See note under 433.407.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth. (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth. (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 8× “180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth. (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 8× “180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 433.416(1) — 2 cases
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth. (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth. (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 433.416(3) — 2 cases
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth. (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Free Oregon, Inc. v. Oregon Health Auth. (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “180 and ORS 433.416. Petitioners then assert that the rules are preempted by section 564 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), codified at 21 USC § 360bbb-3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.