Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 444.040 (2026)

Services for Children with Special Health Needs Account; expenditure of funds; payment of claims

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      444.040 Services for Children with Special Health Needs Account; expenditure of funds; payment of claims. (1) There is created in the General Fund of the State Treasury an account to be known as the Services for Children with Special Health Needs Account.

      (2) All moneys received under ORS 444.020 shall be deposited in the Services for Children with Special Health Needs Account and shall be disbursed in the same manner as the moneys appropriated for carrying out ORS 444.010 to 444.050.

      (3) Moneys in the account are continuously appropriated to the Oregon Department of Administrative Services for use by the Oregon Health and Science University in carrying out the program described in ORS 444.010.

      (4) The Oregon Department of Administrative Services shall draw warrants to pay all claims duly approved by the Oregon Health and Science University, which have been incurred in pursuance of law and the appropriation in subsection (3) of this section. [Amended by 1975 c.693 §11; 1983 c.740 §163; 1989 c.224 §107; 1995 c.162 §83; 2005 c.755 §38]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1976–1976 · leading case: O'Neill v. O'Neill, 545 P.2d 97 (Or. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 545 P.2d 97 (Or. 1976). “525 may be sui generis for some purposes, as held by the Court of Appeals, we believe that for purposes of evidence it is essentially a 'civil proceeding,’ so as to be subject to the provisions for physician-patient privilege, as set forth in ORS 444.040(l)(d), * * *.” 271 Or at…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 444.040(l)(d) — 1 case
O'Neill v. O'Neill, 545 P.2d 97 (Or. 1976). “525 may be sui generis for some purposes, as held by the Court of Appeals, we believe that for purposes of evidence it is essentially a 'civil proceeding,’ so as to be subject to the provisions for physician-patient privilege, as set forth in ORS 444.040(l)(d), * * *.” 271 Or at…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.