450.815
General powers of authority.
For the purpose of carrying out the powers granted to the authority under other
provisions of ORS 450.600 to 450.989 and in addition thereto, the authority
may:
(1) Have and use
a common seal.
(2) Sue and be
sued in its name.
(3) Permit the
use, by lease or otherwise, of any property of the authority by any other
authority, district, city or other governmental agency.
(4) Acquire by
purchase, gift, devise, condemnation proceedings or otherwise, such real and
personal property and rights of way, either within or without the authority, as
in the judgment of the board are necessary or proper to the exercise of its
powers, and to pay for and hold the same.
(5) Make and
accept contracts, deeds, releases and documents which, in the judgment of the
board, are necessary or proper in the exercise of any of the powers of the
authority.
(6) Employ and
pay necessary agents, employees and assistants.
(7) Lay its
sewers and drains in any public street, highway or road in the county, and for
this purpose enter upon it and make all necessary and proper excavations,
restoring it to its proper condition. However, the consent of the proper city,
county or state authorities, as the case may be, shall first be obtained and
the conditions of such consent complied with.
(8) Compel all
residents and property owners in the authority to connect their houses and
structures requiring sewage disposal with adjacent sewers within the authority.
(9) Fix sewer
charges and rentals.
(10) Do any act
necessary or proper to effect and carry out the purposes for which the
authority was formed pursuant to ORS 450.600 to 450.989. [1955 c.614 §25; 2001
c.104 §188]
Notes of Decisions
Rogue Valley Sewer Servs. v. City of Phoenix, 329 P.3d 1 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 11× “Returning to ORS 450.815, which sets forth the general powers of a sanitary authority, the parties disagree as to the effect of ORS 450.”
Rogue Valley Sewer Servs. v. City of Phoenix, 353 P.3d 581 (Or. 2015).
· cites it 3× “LaGrande/Astoria, 281 Or at 148. Rather, the state regulates less extensively than the local ordinance, and leaves it to cities to enact reasonable conditions of consent for sanitary authorities.”
Walton v. Neskowin Reg'l Sanitary Auth. (Or. 2024).
· cites it 3× “In its answer, defendant admitted that it is a public sewer authority with the powers set out in ORS 450.815, that it had installed the sewer lines “on and under property near or on Plaintiffs’ property” no later than 1995, and that, in 2014, it had informed plaintiffs that they…”
Walton v. Neskowin Reg'l Sanitary Auth. (Or. 2024).
· cites it 3× “In its answer, defendant admitted that it is a public sewer authority with the powers set out in ORS 450.815, that it had installed the sewer lines “on and under property near or on Plaintiffs’ property” no later than 1995, and that, in 2014, it had informed plaintiffs that they…”
Rogue Valley Sewer Servs. v. City of Phoenix (Or. 2015).
· cites it 3× “See 2 At oral argument, RVS also argued that the ordinance cannot be said to provide for a “use fee” because such fees are charged in exchange for some service, right, or privilege.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 450.815(4) — 2 cases
Walton v. Neskowin Reg'l Sanitary Auth. (Or. 2024).
“In its answer, defendant admitted that it is a public sewer authority with the powers set out in ORS 450.815, that it had installed the sewer lines “on and under property near or on Plaintiffs’ property” no later than 1995, and that, in 2014, it had informed plaintiffs that they…”
Walton v. Neskowin Reg'l Sanitary Auth. (Or. 2024).
“In its answer, defendant admitted that it is a public sewer authority with the powers set out in ORS 450.815, that it had installed the sewer lines “on and under property near or on Plaintiffs’ property” no later than 1995, and that, in 2014, it had informed plaintiffs that they…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 450.815(7) — 3 cases
Rogue Valley Sewer Servs. v. City of Phoenix, 353 P.3d 581 (Or. 2015).
“LaGrande/Astoria, 281 Or at 148. Rather, the state regulates less extensively than the local ordinance, and leaves it to cities to enact reasonable conditions of consent for sanitary authorities.”
Rogue Valley Sewer Servs. v. City of Phoenix (Or. 2015).
“See 2 At oral argument, RVS also argued that the ordinance cannot be said to provide for a “use fee” because such fees are charged in exchange for some service, right, or privilege.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 450.815(9) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.