Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 455.740 (2026)

Denial of certificate; disciplinary action against certificate holder; rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      455.740 Denial of certificate; disciplinary action against certificate holder; rules. (1) Subject to ORS chapter 183, the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services may deny, condition, suspend, revoke or refuse to renew a certificate of a building official or inspector if the director finds that the building official or inspector has:

      (a) Consistently failed to act in the public interest in the performance of duties;

      (b) Failed to complete the continuing education requirements as required under ORS 455.720 (4);

      (c) Provided false information to the department; or

      (d) Committed an act described in ORS 455.125 or 455.129.

      (2) In any revocation proceeding under this section, the municipality that appoints or employs the building official or inspector may appear as a party in interest, either for or against the revocation.

      (3) When a certification is suspended or revoked under this section, the director may also suspend, deny or place conditions on that person’s right to reapply for certification under ORS 455.735 for a period not to exceed 12 months.

      (4) This section does not limit or otherwise affect the authority of a municipality to dismiss or suspend a building official or inspector at the discretion of the municipality.

      (5) Notwithstanding the requirements of subsections (1) to (4) of this section, the director may adopt rules that:

      (a) Allow certifications to be placed on inactive status; and

      (b) Extend continuing education compliance requirements in case of illness or hardship. [Formerly 456.835; 1991 c.361 §3; 2009 c.593 §9; 2021 c.599 §12]

 

(Remedial Authority of Director)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: City of Portland v. Bldg. Codes Div., 496 P.3d 1108 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
City of Portland v. Bldg. Codes Div., 496 P.3d 1108 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “471; ORS 455.740. In fact, the legislature has specifically defined the term “[m]unicipality” for purposes of ORS chapter 455 in relation to authority to administer a building code: “Municipality means a city, county or other unit of local government other- wise authorized by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.