Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 461.544 (2026)

Use of proceeds of video lottery games

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      461.544 Use of proceeds of video lottery games. All net proceeds from video lottery games shall be allocated to the Administrative Services Economic Development Fund. [1991 c.461 §§1,78; 1993 c.18 §118; 1995 c.814 §9]

 

      Note: 461.544 to 461.549, 461.555, 461.725 and 461.740 were enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but were not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 461 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

 

      461.545 [1989 c.828 §7; repealed by 1991 c.461 §79 and 1991 c.962 §15]

 

      461.546 [1991 c.962 §2a; 1993 c.18 §119; repealed by 1995 c.814 §4]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1993–2008 · leading case: Wolf v. Oregon Lottery Comm'n, 182 P.3d 180 (Or. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wolf v. Oregon Lottery Comm'n, 182 P.3d 180 (Or. 2008). “Or Laws 1991, ch 962, § 13(1), compiled as a note after ORS 461.544 (1991) (so providing). The Court of Appeals took special notice of section *353 13(2), which provided, “After considering the findings and recommendations of this report, the lottery commission shall modify its…”
State Ex Rel. Mountaineer Park, Inc. v. Polan, 438 S.E.2d 308 (W. Va. 1993). “-217(2) (1991), and specified the use of proceeds from video lottery games, Or.Rev.Stat. §§ 461.544 to 461.548 (1991).”
Wolf v. Oregon Lottery Comm'n, 149 P.3d 303 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “” Or Laws 1991, ch 962, § 13, compiled as a note after ORS 461.544 (1991). 3 That provision required the Lottery to measure retailers’ compensation for providing video lottery games *679 in terms of revenue, operating costs, and capital expenditures (“space * * * for the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.