Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 468A.715 (2026)
Licensed contractor required; exception
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
468A.715 Licensed contractor required; exception. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, an owner or operator of a facility containing asbestos shall require only licensed contractors to perform asbestos abatement projects.
(2) A facility owner or operator whose own employees maintain, repair, renovate or demolish the facility may allow the employees to work on asbestos abatement projects only if the employees comply with the training and certification requirements established under ORS 468A.730. [Formerly 468.881]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: Vickers/Nelson & Assocs. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 148 P.3d 917 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
Vickers/Nelson & Assocs. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 148 P.3d 917 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “Vickers/Nelson contends that the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rule implementing ORS 468A.715 (OAR 340-248-0010(33)) exceeds DEQ’s statutory authority and that the imposition of a penalty based on that rule was error.”
State v. Lonergan, 149 P.3d 1215 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “, 209 Or App 179, 189 , 148 P3d 917 (2006) (construing the phrase, “operator of a facility,” in ORS 468A.715(1)); Godfrey v. Fred Meyer Stores, 202 Or App 673, 689 , 124 P3d 621 (2005), rev den, 340 Or 672 (2006) (“In evaluating competing plausible interpretations of a statute,…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 468A.715(1): 2 cases
Vickers/Nelson & Assocs. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 148 P.3d 917 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “Vickers/Nelson contends that the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rule implementing ORS 468A.715 (OAR 340-248-0010(33)) exceeds DEQ’s statutory authority and that the imposition of a penalty based on that rule was error.”
State v. Lonergan, 149 P.3d 1215 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “, 209 Or App 179, 189 , 148 P3d 917 (2006) (construing the phrase, “operator of a facility,” in ORS 468A.715(1)); Godfrey v. Fred Meyer Stores, 202 Or App 673, 689 , 124 P3d 621 (2005), rev den, 340 Or 672 (2006) (“In evaluating competing plausible interpretations of a statute,…”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 468A.715(2): 1 case
Vickers/Nelson & Assocs. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 148 P.3d 917 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “Vickers/Nelson contends that the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rule implementing ORS 468A.715 (OAR 340-248-0010(33)) exceeds DEQ’s statutory authority and that the imposition of a penalty based on that rule was error.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.