Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 469.010 (2026)

Policy

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

469.010 Policy. The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that:

(1) Continued growth in demand for nonrenewable energy forms poses a serious and immediate, as well as future, problem. It is essential that future generations not be left a legacy of vanished or depleted resources, resulting in massive environmental, social and financial impact.

(2) It is the goal of Oregon to promote the efficient use of energy resources and to develop permanently sustainable energy resources. The need exists for comprehensive state leadership in energy production, distribution and utilization. It is, therefore, the policy of Oregon:

(a) That development and use of a diverse array of permanently sustainable energy resources be encouraged utilizing to the highest degree possible the private sector of our free enterprise system.

(b) That through state government example and other effective communications, energy conservation and elimination of wasteful and uneconomical uses of energy and materials be promoted. This conservation must include, but not be limited to, resource recovery and materials recycling.

(c) That the basic human needs of every citizen, present and future, shall be given priority in the allocation of energy resources, commensurate with perpetuation of a free and productive economy with special attention to the preservation and enhancement of environmental quality.

(d) That state government assist every citizen and industry in adjusting to a diminished availability of energy.

(e) That energy-efficient modes of transportation for people and goods shall be encouraged, while energy-inefficient modes of transportation shall be discouraged.

(f) That cost-effectiveness be considered in state agency decision-making relating to energy sources, facilities or conservation, and that cost-effectiveness be considered in all agency decision-making relating to energy facilities.

(g) That state government shall provide a source of impartial and objective information in order that this energy policy may be enhanced. [1975 c.606 §1; 1979 c.723 §1]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1977–2018 · leading case: Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994). · cites it 14× “" On August 13, 1993, 11 days after SB 1016 became law, EFSC adopted temporary rules that readopted many of its siting rules and amended others.”

Application of Portland Gen. Elec. Co., 561 P.2d 154 (Or. 1977). · cites it 4× “The statute directs all agencies, including the council, to review their policies for consistency with the state's energy policy stated in ORS 469.010 and, after July 1, 1976, to report thereon to an Energy Policy Review Committee.”

Benson v. City of Portland, 850 P.2d 416 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “" ORS 469.010(1)(d). [8] I also conclude that the provision in PCC 24.”

1000 Friends of Or. v. Jackson Cnty., 423 P.3d 793 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). “ORS 469.010(2) declares a need for "comprehensive state leadership in energy production, distribution and utilization.”

Wah Chang v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 301 P.3d 934 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “The service classifications and schedule forms shall be designed consistently with the requirements of ORS 469.010. Each public utility is required to conform its schedules of rates to such classification.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 469.010(1)(d) — 1 case

Benson v. City of Portland, 850 P.2d 416 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). “" ORS 469.010(1)(d). [8] I also conclude that the provision in PCC 24.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 469.010(2) — 1 case

1000 Friends of Or. v. Jackson Cnty., 423 P.3d 793 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). “ORS 469.010(2) declares a need for "comprehensive state leadership in energy production, distribution and utilization.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 469.010(d) — 1 case

Benson v. City of Portland, 850 P.2d 416 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). “" ORS 469.010(1)(d). [8] I also conclude that the provision in PCC 24.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.