Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 471.331 (2026)

Notice to licensee when refusal to renew or suspension or cancellation of license based on adverse neighborhood impact; no stay of order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      471.331 Notice to licensee when refusal to renew or suspension or cancellation of license based on adverse neighborhood impact; no stay of order. (1) Whenever the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission proposes to refuse to renew or to suspend or cancel any license issued under this chapter because of adverse neighborhood impact of the licensee’s operation, notwithstanding ORS 183.435, the commission shall grant the affected licensee 20 days from notification of the proposed commission action to request a hearing.

      (2) Notwithstanding ORS 183.482 (3), the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission shall not stay any order refusing a license or suspending or canceling any license if the order was entered on grounds stated in ORS 471.313 or 471.315 (1)(c). [Formerly 471.312; 2021 c.351 §83; 2023 c.391 §17]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2011–2011 · leading case: El Rio Nilo, LLC v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 246 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
El Rio Nilo, LLC v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 246 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 9× “331(1), which grants a liquor licensee “20 days from notification” to make a hearing request. Petitioner contends that “notification” under the statute means “actual receipt of notice,” that it did request a hearing within that time period, and that the commission rule…”
El Rio Nilo, LLC v. Olcc, 246 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 9× “Petitioner contends that "notification" under the statute means "actual receipt of notice," that it did request a hearing within that time period, and that the commission rule establishing a different timeline is invalid.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 471.331(1) — 2 cases
El Rio Nilo, LLC v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 246 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “331(1), which grants a liquor licensee “20 days from notification” to make a hearing request. Petitioner contends that “notification” under the statute means “actual receipt of notice,” that it did request a hearing within that time period, and that the commission rule…”
El Rio Nilo, LLC v. Olcc, 246 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “Petitioner contends that "notification" under the statute means "actual receipt of notice," that it did request a hearing within that time period, and that the commission rule establishing a different timeline is invalid.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 471.331(2) — 2 cases
El Rio Nilo, LLC v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 246 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “331(1), which grants a liquor licensee “20 days from notification” to make a hearing request. Petitioner contends that “notification” under the statute means “actual receipt of notice,” that it did request a hearing within that time period, and that the commission rule…”
El Rio Nilo, LLC v. Olcc, 246 P.3d 508 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “Petitioner contends that "notification" under the statute means "actual receipt of notice," that it did request a hearing within that time period, and that the commission rule establishing a different timeline is invalid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.