Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 471.392 (2026)

Definitions for ORS 471.392 to 471.400

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      471.392 Definitions for ORS 471.392 to 471.400. For the purposes of ORS 471.392 to 471.400:

      (1) “Manufacturer or wholesaler” means:

      (a) A person holding a brewery license issued under ORS 471.221, a winery license issued under ORS 471.223, a grower sales privilege license issued under ORS 471.227, a distillery license issued under ORS 471.230, a wholesale malt beverage and wine license issued under ORS 471.235, a warehouse license issued under ORS 471.242, a direct to retailer permit issued under ORS 471.274 or a direct shipper permit issued under ORS 471.282.

      (b) Any manufacturer of alcoholic liquors whose products are sold in the State of Oregon.

      (2) “Retail licensee” means the holder of a full or limited on-premises sales license, an off-premises sales license or a temporary sales license. “Retail licensee” does not include a bona fide trade association that represents retail licensees and that is open to all persons licensed under at least one type of retail license. [1995 c.301 §76; 1997 c.249 §172; 1999 c.351 §31; 2016 c.3 §5; 2023 c.391 §18]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Clackamas Grocery Outlet Warehouse v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 283 P.3d 936 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Clackamas Grocery Outlet Warehouse v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 283 P.3d 936 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “Also of significance to this case are the so-called “tied-house” provisions, ORS 471.392 - 471.400, which, the OLCC contends, “prevent licensees from combining the features of one type of license with the features of another type of license, as well as from entering into certain…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 471.392(2) — 1 case
Clackamas Grocery Outlet Warehouse v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 283 P.3d 936 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). “Also of significance to this case are the so-called “tied-house” provisions, ORS 471.392 - 471.400, which, the OLCC contends, “prevent licensees from combining the features of one type of license with the features of another type of license, as well as from entering into certain…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 471.392(l)(a) — 1 case
Clackamas Grocery Outlet Warehouse v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 283 P.3d 936 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). “Also of significance to this case are the so-called “tied-house” provisions, ORS 471.392 - 471.400, which, the OLCC contends, “prevent licensees from combining the features of one type of license with the features of another type of license, as well as from entering into certain…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.