471.412
Allowing visibly intoxicated person to consume alcoholic beverages; good faith
effort; effect on other liability; letters of reprimand. (1) A licensee or permittee may
not allow a person to consume or to continue to consume alcoholic beverages on
the licensed premises after observing that the person is visibly intoxicated.
(2) A licensee or
permittee is not in violation of subsection (1) of this section if the licensee
or permittee makes a good faith effort to remove any unconsumed alcoholic
beverages from the person’s possession when the licensee or permittee observes
that the person is visibly intoxicated.
(3) Nothing in
this section applies to determining liability under ORS 471.565.
(4)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis
Commission shall only impose letters of reprimand for the first three
violations of this section within a two-year period. For license renewal
purposes, the first three violations of this section in a two-year period do
not apply in determining the past record of compliance under ORS 471.313
(1)(d)(G). [1989 c.785 §2; 1995 c.301 §69; 2011 c.107 §2; 2021 c.351 §101; 2023
c.391 §20]
471.415 [Amended by 1955 c.657 §10; 1957
c.297 §1; repealed by 1995 c.301 §81]
471.417 [1985 c.306 §2; 1989 c.471 §1;
repealed by 1995 c.301 §81]
471.420 [Amended by 1959 c.399 §1; 1971
c.680 §2; repealed by 1979 c.43 §1 and by 1979 c.190 §431]
Notes of Decisions
Fulmer v. Timber Inn Restaurant & Lounge, Inc., 954 P.2d 201 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 6× “410(1), ORS 471.412(1), and ORS 472.310(3) (1991), which prohibit social hosts and licensees of the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) from, among other things, serving or allowing to be served persons who are visibly intoxicated.”
Schutz v. La Costita III, Inc., 302 P.3d 460 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 3× “” The legislature amended ORS 471.412 in 2011. Or Laws 2011, ch 107, § 2.”
Papas v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm'n, 161 P.3d 948 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
“410(1) (prohibiting licensees from making any alcoholic beverage available to an intoxicated person); ORS 471.412 (prohibiting licensees from knowingly allowing an intoxicated person to consume alcoholic beverages).”
Bonner v. Am. Golf Corp. of California, 372 Or. 814 (Or. 2024).
· cites it 2× “410(1), which generally pro- hibits the provision of alcohol to a visibly intoxicated per- son; ORS 471.412(1), which prohibits an OLCC licensee from permitting a visibly intoxicated person to consume alcohol on the licenses premises; and ORS 471.”
Bonner v. Am. Golf Corp. of California, 372 Or. 814 (Or. 2024).
· cites it 2× “410(1), which generally pro- hibits the provision of alcohol to a visibly intoxicated per- son; ORS 471.412(1), which prohibits an OLCC licensee from permitting a visibly intoxicated person to consume alcohol on the licenses premises; and ORS 471.”
Fulmer v. Timber Inn Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. (Or. 2000).
· cites it 5× “We begin with plaintiffs' first three claims, each of which alleged negligence per se . Plaintiffs alleged that, by continuing to serve alcohol to plaintiff after he was visibly intoxicated, defendants violated ORS 471.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 471.412(1) — 6 cases
Fulmer v. Timber Inn Restaurant & Lounge, Inc., 954 P.2d 201 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).
“410(1), ORS 471.412(1), and ORS 472.310(3) (1991), which prohibit social hosts and licensees of the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) from, among other things, serving or allowing to be served persons who are visibly intoxicated.”
Bonner v. Am. Golf Corp. of California, 372 Or. 814 (Or. 2024).
“410(1), which generally pro- hibits the provision of alcohol to a visibly intoxicated per- son; ORS 471.412(1), which prohibits an OLCC licensee from permitting a visibly intoxicated person to consume alcohol on the licenses premises; and ORS 471.”
Bonner v. Am. Golf Corp. of California, 372 Or. 814 (Or. 2024).
“410(1), which generally pro- hibits the provision of alcohol to a visibly intoxicated per- son; ORS 471.412(1), which prohibits an OLCC licensee from permitting a visibly intoxicated person to consume alcohol on the licenses premises; and ORS 471.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.