Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.245 (2026)

Conditional discharge

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

475.245 Conditional discharge. (1)(a) Whenever a person is charged with an offense listed in subsection (5) of this section, the court, with the consent of the district attorney and the person, may defer further proceedings and place the person on probation. The terms of the probation shall be defined by a probation agreement.

(b) A probation agreement carries the understanding that if the defendant fulfills the terms of the agreement, the criminal charges filed against the defendant will be dismissed with prejudice.

(A) The right to a speedy trial and trial by jury;

(B) The right to present evidence on the defendant’s behalf;

(D) The right to contest evidence presented against the defendant, including the right to object to hearsay evidence; and

(E) The right to appeal from a judgment of conviction resulting from an adjudication of guilt entered under subsection (2) of this section, unless the appeal is based on an allegation that the sentence exceeds the maximum allowed by law or constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

(d) The agreement must include a requirement that the defendant pay any restitution owed to the victim as determined by the court, and any fees for court-appointed counsel ordered by the court under ORS 135.050.

(e) The agreement may not contain a requirement that the defendant enter a plea of guilty or no contest on any charge in the accusatory instrument.

(f) Entering into a probation agreement does not constitute an admission of guilt and is not sufficient to warrant a finding or adjudication of guilt by a court.

(g) Police reports or other documents associated with the criminal charges in a court file other than the probation agreement may not be admitted into evidence, and do not establish a factual basis for finding the defendant guilty, unless the court resumes criminal proceedings under subsection (2) of this section.

(2) Upon violation of a term or condition of the probation agreement, the court may:

(a) Impose sanctions of up to a total of 30 days of imprisonment; or

(b) Resume the criminal proceedings in accordance with the waiver of rights in the probation agreement. The defendant may not contest the sufficiency of the evidence establishing the defendant’s guilt of the offenses in the accusatory instrument.

(3) Upon fulfillment of the terms and conditions of the probation agreement, the court shall discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against the person. Discharge and dismissal under this section shall be without adjudication of guilt and is not a conviction for purposes of this section or for purposes of disqualifications or disabilities imposed by law upon conviction of a crime. There may be only one discharge and dismissal under this section with respect to any person.

(4) In the event that the period of probation under this section expires, but the terms and conditions of the probation agreement have not been fulfilled and no probation violation proceeding was initiated prior to the expiration of the period of probation, the court may not discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against the person. The court shall instead issue an order requiring the person to appear and to show cause why the court should not enter an adjudication of guilt as described in subsection (2) of this section due to the failure of the person to fulfill the terms and conditions of the probation agreement prior to expiration of the period of probation. At the hearing on the order to show cause, after considering any evidence or argument from the district attorney and the person, the court may:

(a) If the court finds that the person has fulfilled the terms and conditions of the probation agreement, discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against the person as described in subsection (3) of this section;

(b) Order a new period of probation to allow the person to fulfill the terms and conditions of the probation agreement; or

(c) Resume the criminal proceedings in accordance with the waiver of rights in the probation agreement. If the court proceeds under this paragraph, the person may not contest the sufficiency of the evidence establishing the person’s guilt of the offenses in the accusatory instrument.

(5) This section applies to the following offenses:

(a) Possession of a controlled substance under ORS 475.752 (3), 475.794, 475.814, 475.824, 475.834, 475.854, 475.874, 475.884 or 475.894;

(b) Unlawfully possessing a prescription drug under ORS 689.527 (6);

(c) Unlawfully possessing marijuana plants, usable marijuana, cannabinoid products, cannabinoid concentrates or cannabinoid extracts as described in ORS 475C.337 or 475C.341, if the offense is a misdemeanor or felony;

(d) Endangering the welfare of a minor under ORS 163.575 (1)(b);

(e) Frequenting a place where controlled substances are used under ORS 167.222; and

(f) A property offense that is motivated by a dependence on a controlled substance or a marijuana item as defined in ORS 475C.009. [1977 c.745 §21; 1995 c.440 §30; 1999 c.799 §1; 2001 c.834 §§6,10; 2005 c.706 §26; 2005 c.708 §§56,57; 2011 c.524 §2; 2013 c.75 §1; 2015 c.125 §1; 2016 c.24 §58; 2017 c.21 §23; 2019 c.445 §1; 2024 c.70 §53; 2025 c.532 §13]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: State v. Granberry, 316 P.3d 363 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Granberry, 316 P.3d 363 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 33× “See generally ORS 475.245. 1 The state sought a court determination that defendant had violated the terms of her probation and to have the court enter a conviction on the drug-possession charge, but the court rejected the state’s request on the ground that the state had not…”

State v. Long-Ellis, 543 P.3d 761 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “Granberry involved a defendant who was put on probation under a conditional-discharge agreement, without convic- tion, pursuant to ORS 475.245 (2009).3 260 Or App at 16 . Construing the phrase “[u]pon fulfillment of the terms and conditions [of probation]” in ORS 475.”

Velasco v. State, 426 P.3d 114 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 5× “In his underlying criminal case, petitioner pleaded guilty to one count of possession of marijuana and received a conditional discharge under ORS 475.245 (2013), amended by Or. Laws 2015, ch.”

State v. Herrera, 383 P.3d 301 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 17× “894, assigning error to the entry of that judgment after the revocation of conditional discharge, ORS 475.245. Invoking State v. Granberry, 260 Or App 15 , 316 P3d 363 (2013), defendant raises an unpreserved claim that, because the state did not initiate revocation proceedings…”

State v. Wibbens, 243 P.3d 790 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “As part of his plea agreement, defendant was placed on probation under the first-time drug offender statute, ORS 475.245, and entry of judgment was suspended pending successful completion of his term of probation.”

State v. Reynolds, 243 P.3d 496 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “See ORS 475.245 (providing, inpart, that, “[w]henever any person pleads guilty to or is found guilty of possession of a controlled substance under * * * [ORS] 475.”

Erickson v. Mun. Court Judge, 692 P.2d 628 (Or. Ct. App. 1984). “ORS 475.245 provides that in certain circumstances when a defendant pleads guilty to or is found guilty of possession of a controlled substances under ORS 475.”

State v. Harju, 321 Or. App. 530 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “Defendant was convicted of that charge after first entering a preconviction conditional-discharge diversion, see ORS 475.245, and then violating the terms of that diversion.”

State v. Spencer, 881 P.2d 154 (Or. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 7× “ORS 475.245. 2 The state opposes the motion, arguing that a conditional discharge is not an appealable judgment or order.”

Dist. of Columbia Metro. Police Dep't v. Porter (D.C. 2025). “2013)); Or. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 475.245 (enacted 1977 by 1977 Or.”

State v. Fitzgerald, 777 P.2d 1008 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). “He was put on probation for two years with further proceedings deferred under ORS 475.245. That statute provides that a first-time offender under ORS 475.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.245(1) — 1 case

State v. Harju, 321 Or. App. 530 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “Defendant was convicted of that charge after first entering a preconviction conditional-discharge diversion, see ORS 475.245, and then violating the terms of that diversion.”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.245(4) — 2 cases

State v. Long-Ellis, 543 P.3d 761 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “Granberry involved a defendant who was put on probation under a conditional-discharge agreement, without convic- tion, pursuant to ORS 475.245 (2009).3 260 Or App at 16 . Construing the phrase “[u]pon fulfillment of the terms and conditions [of probation]” in ORS 475.”

State v. Herrera, 383 P.3d 301 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). “894, assigning error to the entry of that judgment after the revocation of conditional discharge, ORS 475.245. Invoking State v. Granberry, 260 Or App 15 , 316 P3d 363 (2013), defendant raises an unpreserved claim that, because the state did not initiate revocation proceedings…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.