Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.890 (2026)

Unlawful delivery of methamphetamine

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      475.890 Unlawful delivery of methamphetamine. (1) Except as authorized by ORS 475.005 to 475.285 and 475.752 to 475.980, it is unlawful for any person to deliver methamphetamine.

      (2) Unlawful delivery of methamphetamine is a Class B felony.

      (3) Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section, unlawful delivery of methamphetamine is a Class A felony if the delivery is to a person under 18 years of age.

      (4) The minimum fine for unlawful delivery of methamphetamine is $500. [2005 c.708 §16; 2011 c.597 §13]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 139 cases (53 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: State v. Serbin, 527 P.3d 794 (Or. Ct. App. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Serbin, 527 P.3d 794 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 4× “ORS 475.890(1)5 and ORS 475.850(1)6 state in rel- evant part that “it is unlawful for any person to deliver,” respectively, methamphetamine and heroin.”
State v. Sheikh-Nur, 398 P.3d 472 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “*533 As defined by ORS 475.890, 3 unlawful delivery of methamphetamine to a minor is simply an enhanced version of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine; therefore, the court should have entered a single conviction for the former offense.”
State v. O'Hare, 481 P.3d 953 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 5× “At the close of the state’s case, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on that count, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for delivery.”
State v. Wesley, 533 P.3d 786 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 3× “Lane County Circuit Court 19CR58352; A173334 533 P3d 786 Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for unlawful delivery of meth- amphetamine (Count 2), ORS 475.890; unlawful possession of heroin (Count 3), ORS 475.”
State v. Villagomez, 380 P.3d 1150 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890, and possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.”
State v. Lien, 441 P.3d 185 (Or. 2019). · cites it 2× “850, and no contest to one count of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890. Defendant Wilverding conditionally pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.”
State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “After pleading guilty, defendant was convicted of six counts of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890 (Counts 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 12); six counts of unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.”
State v. Stewart, 386 P.3d 688 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “A jury convicted defendant of one count of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine for consideration, ORS 475.890 and ORS 475.900(2)(a), and one count of possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.”
State v. Davis, 385 P.3d 1253 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence that the police discovered following a traffic stop.”
State v. Soto-Navarro, 482 P.3d 150 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “28 grams of methamphetamine, multiple methamphetamine pipes, $3,231 in cash, a large quantity of empty plastic bag- gies, a digital scale, and eight cell phones.”
State v. Hubbell, 500 P.3d 728 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “at 392 n 1 (“In this case, defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence that the state adduced to support his conviction for delivery under ORS 475.890.”). 8 Because this opinion overrules our existing precedent, the panel specifi- cally advised all members of…”
State v. Savath, 447 P.3d 1 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). “894, delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890, possession of oxycodone, ORS 475.”
Show all 139 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.890(1) — 4 cases
State v. Serbin, 527 P.3d 794 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “ORS 475.890(1)5 and ORS 475.850(1)6 state in rel- evant part that “it is unlawful for any person to deliver,” respectively, methamphetamine and heroin.”
State v. Westcott, 385 P.3d 1268 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Lupercio-Quezada, 198 P.3d 973 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Robertson, 336 Or. App. 479 (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.890(2) — 28 cases
State v. Soto-Navarro, 482 P.3d 150 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “28 grams of methamphetamine, multiple methamphetamine pipes, $3,231 in cash, a large quantity of empty plastic bag- gies, a digital scale, and eight cell phones.”
State v. Ortega-Gonsalez, 404 P.3d 1081 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Sherriff, 465 P.3d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Dippre, 512 P.3d 835 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Hunt, 442 P.3d 232 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.890(3) — 4 cases
State v. Moreno-Hernandez, 415 P.3d 1088 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Decamp, 285 P.3d 1130 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
State v. Smoot, 432 P.3d 361 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Walker, 479 P.3d 348 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.