Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 475C.053 (2026)

Duty to request land use compatibility statement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      475C.053 Duty to request land use compatibility statement. (1) Prior to receiving a license under ORS 475C.065, 475C.085, 475C.093, 475C.097 or 475C.548, an applicant shall request a land use compatibility statement from the city or county that authorizes the land use. The land use compatibility statement must demonstrate that the requested license is for a land use that is allowable as a permitted or conditional use within the given zoning designation where the land is located. The Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission may not issue a license if the land use compatibility statement shows that the proposed land use is prohibited in the applicable zone.

      (2) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, a city or county that receives a request for a land use compatibility statement under this section must act on that request within 21 days of:

      (a) Receipt of the request, if the land use is allowable as an outright permitted use; or

      (b) Final local permit approval, if the land use is allowable as a conditional use.

      (3) A city or county that receives a request for a land use compatibility statement under this section is not required to act on that request during the period that the commission discontinues licensing those premises pursuant to ORS 475C.950 (4)(b).

      (4) A city or county action concerning a land use compatibility statement under this section is not a land use decision for purposes of ORS chapter 195, 196, 197, 197A, 215 or 227. [Formerly 475B.063; 2023 c.519 §10]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 38× “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 38× “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 38× “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475C.053(1) — 3 cases
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475C.053(2) — 3 cases
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475C.053(2)(a) — 3 cases
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475C.053(2)(b) — 3 cases
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
State ex rel Elitextrx, LLC v. Siegel (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “The circuit court dismissed the action, agreeing with the county’s position that, under ORS 475C.053, it was not yet required to issue the Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUCS) that plaintiff requested in connection with obtaining a license to relocate its marijuana production…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.