Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 508.921 (2026)

Findings; rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      508.921 Findings; rules. The Legislative Assembly finds that the Oregon ocean Dungeness crab fishery is overcapitalized. This overcapitalization has led to economic destabilization of the ocean Dungeness crab industry and the coastal communities relying on the crab harvest and can cause excessive harvesting pressure on Oregon’s ocean Dungeness crab resources. Since the state legislatures of Washington and California have enacted programs restricting participation in the ocean Dungeness crab fishery, the possibility of increased effort in Oregon coastal waters by displaced vessels is increased. Notwithstanding any other provision of the commercial fishing laws, in order to promote the economic well-being of the Oregon ocean Dungeness crab industry and the coastal communities relying on the harvest, to protect the livelihood of participants in the Oregon ocean Dungeness crab fishery who have historically and continuously participated in the ocean Dungeness crab fishery and to prevent a concentration of fishing effort, the State Fish and Wildlife Commission by rule shall establish a system for restricting participation in the Oregon ocean Dungeness crab fishery. [1995 c.484 §2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2010 · leading case: Fishermen Against Irresponsible Reallocation, Inc. v. Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 193 P.3d 1014 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
Fishermen Against Irresponsible Reallocation, Inc. v. Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 193 P.3d 1014 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 11× “ORS 508.921 provides: “The Legislative Assembly finds that the Oregon ocean Dungeness crab fishery is overcapitalized.”
Marble v. Dep't of Fish & Wildlife, 234 P.3d 1062 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 3× “ORS 508.921; ORS 508.926; ORS 508.931. Specifically, through ORS 508.”
Mar Pacifico, Inc. v. Dep't of Fish & Wildlife, 939 P.2d 637 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 5× “910, contending that the Board erred in failing to grant Mar Pacifico a permit to use the F/V El Camino to fish for Dungeness crab in Oregon coastal waters pursuant to ORS 508.921 to ORS 508.941. Specifically, petitioners contend that the Board has erroneously interpreted ORS…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.