509.031
Rainbow trout as game fish; return to water of incidental commercial catch. (1) It shall be the policy of the
State of Oregon that rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, including steelhead
trout are game fish, and shall be managed to provide recreational angling for
the people and to protect wild native stocks. Recognizing that rainbow trout
are sometimes intermingled with food fish, the State Fish and Wildlife
Commission shall regulate to minimize the incidental catch of rainbow trout
that may be taken under subsection (2) of this section by commercial fishing
gear, including but not limited to regulations as to season, gear and area.
(2) Any rainbow
trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, including steelhead trout taken as an incidental
catch, by any person fishing commercially shall be returned immediately to the
water and shall not be bought or sold within the state.
(3) Nothing in
this section is intended to affect Indian fishing rights as granted by federal
treaties. [1975 c.1 §2 (enacted in lieu of 509.030); 1987 c.199 §1; 1991 c.47 §1]
509.035 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]
509.036 [1973 c.500 §§6,7; repealed by
1975 c.416 §2]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
1
case, 1986–1986 · leading case:
State v. Heuker, 730 P.2d 1258 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
State v. Heuker, 730 P.2d 1258 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 8× “) Defendant argues that the mere possession of steelhead is not prohibited by ORS 509.031, which the state contends authorized the State Fish and Wildlife Commission to promulgate the regulation, and that, therefore, the commission exceeded the scope of its delegated rulemaking…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 509.031(1) — 1 case
State v. Heuker, 730 P.2d 1258 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
“) Defendant argues that the mere possession of steelhead is not prohibited by ORS 509.031, which the state contends authorized the State Fish and Wildlife Commission to promulgate the regulation, and that, therefore, the commission exceeded the scope of its delegated rulemaking…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 509.031(2) — 1 case
State v. Heuker, 730 P.2d 1258 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
“) Defendant argues that the mere possession of steelhead is not prohibited by ORS 509.031, which the state contends authorized the State Fish and Wildlife Commission to promulgate the regulation, and that, therefore, the commission exceeded the scope of its delegated rulemaking…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.