Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 511.106 (2026)

Commercial fishing in Columbia River and tributaries restricted

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      511.106 Commercial fishing in Columbia River and tributaries restricted. It is unlawful in the Columbia River and its tributaries to:

      (1) Take salmon for commercial purposes east of its confluence with the Deschutes River.

      (2) Take food fish for commercial purposes in a closed area at and adjacent to the mouth of the Sandy River, Hood River and Deschutes River. The closed area shall be one-fourth of a mile in width, extending out into the Columbia River at right angles to the thread of the stream, and one mile in length below the upper or right-hand bank or shoreline of such tributary where the tributary intersects the left-hand bank or shoreline of the Columbia River. [1965 c.570 §140; 1969 c.358 §1; 1989 c.126 §1]

 

      511.110 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.115 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.120 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.125 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.130 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.135 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.140 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.145 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.150 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.155 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.160 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.165 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.170 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

      511.205 [Repealed by 1965 c.570 §152]

 

ROGUE RIVER AREA

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1969–1969 · leading case: Sohappy v. Smith, 302 F. Supp. 899 (D. Or. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sohappy v. Smith, 302 F. Supp. 899 (D. Or. 1969). · cites it 2× “” They also contend that ORS 511.106(1), 506.006(4), and certain orders of the Fish Commission establishing closed areas or seasons above Bonneville Dam may not be applied so as to prevent Indians from taking fish at their usual and accustomed places east of the confluence of…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 511.106(1) — 1 case
Sohappy v. Smith, 302 F. Supp. 899 (D. Or. 1969). “” They also contend that ORS 511.106(1), 506.006(4), and certain orders of the Fish Commission establishing closed areas or seasons above Bonneville Dam may not be applied so as to prevent Indians from taking fish at their usual and accustomed places east of the confluence of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.