Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 540.310 (2026)

Ditches and canals; headgates; measuring devices; flumes along lines of ditches

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      540.310 Ditches and canals; headgates; measuring devices; flumes along lines of ditches. (1) The owner of any ditch or canal shall maintain to the satisfaction of the Water Resources Commission a substantial headgate at the point where the water is diverted. It shall be of such construction that it can be locked and kept closed by the watermaster.

      (2) The owner shall construct and maintain, when required by the commission, suitable measuring devices at such points along the ditch as may be necessary to assist the watermaster in determining the amount of water that is to be diverted into the ditch from the stream, or taken from it by the various users.

      (3) When necessary for the protection of other water users, the commission may require flumes to be installed along the line of any ditch. [Amended by 1985 c.673 §84]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1973–1973 · leading case: Vandehey v. Wheeler, 499 P.2d 1319 (Or. Ct. App. 1973).
Vandehey v. Wheeler, 499 P.2d 1319 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 20× “” ORS 540.310 (1). “If any owner of irrigation works refuses or neglects to construct and put in headgates, flumes or measuring devices, - as required under ORS 540.”
Vandehey v. Wheeler, 507 P.2d 831 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 10× “[2] ORS 540.310 requires that a control or measuring device be installed at the point where the water is diverted.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 540.310(1): 2 cases
Vandehey v. Wheeler, 499 P.2d 1319 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). “” ORS 540.310 (1). “If any owner of irrigation works refuses or neglects to construct and put in headgates, flumes or measuring devices, - as required under ORS 540.”
Vandehey v. Wheeler, 507 P.2d 831 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). “[2] ORS 540.310 requires that a control or measuring device be installed at the point where the water is diverted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.