Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 609.015 (2026)

Application of ORS 609.030 and 609.035 to 609.110

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      609.015 Application of ORS 609.030 and 609.035 to 609.110. (1) ORS 609.030 and 609.035 to 609.110 apply in every county except as otherwise provided by county charter or ordinance. ORS 609.030 and 609.035 to 609.110 do not limit the powers of cities and counties to adopt ordinances and regulations relating to the control of dogs.

      (2) A county dog licensing and control program shall not apply within the limits of a city that has its own dog licensing and control program. [1967 c.496 §3; 1977 c.237 §1; subsection (2) enacted as 1977 c.802 §2; 1999 c.756 §16]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2001 · leading case: Hood River Cnty. v. Stevenson, 33 P.3d 325 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hood River Cnty. v. Stevenson, 33 P.3d 325 (Or. Ct. App. 2001). “See ORS 609.015 (counties may adopt ordinances and regulations relating to the control of dogs); ORS 203.”
Bowlin v. Deschutes Cnty., 754 P.2d 30 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). “Moreover, ORS 609.015(1) provides that the state statutes on dog control “shall not be construed to limit the powers of cities and counties to adopt ordinances and regulations, relating to the control of dogs.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 609.015(1) — 1 case
Bowlin v. Deschutes Cnty., 754 P.2d 30 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). “Moreover, ORS 609.015(1) provides that the state statutes on dog control “shall not be construed to limit the powers of cities and counties to adopt ordinances and regulations, relating to the control of dogs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.