Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 634.026 (2026)

Pesticide labeling requirements; highly toxic pesticides; applicability of law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      634.026 Pesticide labeling requirements; highly toxic pesticides; applicability of law. (1) If not otherwise required or prescribed by federal law or rule, each package or container of every pesticide shall be labeled with:

      (a) The name and address of the manufacturer or person for whom it was manufactured.

      (b) The brand name or trademark under which the material is sold.

      (c) The professed standard of quality of the material.

      (d) The net weight or volume of the contents.

      (e) Adequate and necessary directions for its proper and intended use.

      (2) In addition to the information required by subsection (1) of this section, any pesticide which is highly toxic shall be labeled with:

      (a) A sign of a skull and crossbones.

      (b) The word “poison” in red on the package printed on a background of contrasting color.

      (c) A poison antidote for the material, if any.

      (3) The provisions of subsection (2) of this section shall not apply to bleaching powder or chloride of lime. [1973 c.341 §10]

 

      634.030 [Repealed by 1953 c.118 §2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1994–1994 · leading case: Henderson v. Dep't of Agric., 875 P.2d 487 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).
Henderson v. Dep't of Agric., 875 P.2d 487 (Or. Ct. App. 1994). “As a supplement to the federal pesticide labeling *174 requirements, ORS 634.026(l)(e) requires that every pesticide label include “[a]dequate and necessary directions for its proper and intended use.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 634.026(l)(e) — 1 case
Henderson v. Dep't of Agric., 875 P.2d 487 (Or. Ct. App. 1994). “As a supplement to the federal pesticide labeling *174 requirements, ORS 634.026(l)(e) requires that every pesticide label include “[a]dequate and necessary directions for its proper and intended use.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.