Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 646A.414 (2026)

Limitations on actions against dealers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      646A.414 Limitations on actions against dealers. (1) Except as provided in ORS 646A.405, nothing in ORS 646A.400 to 646A.418 creates a cause of action by a consumer against a vehicle dealer.

      (2) A manufacturer may not join a dealer as a party in a proceeding brought under ORS 646A.400 to 646A.418, nor may the manufacturer try to collect from a dealer damages assessed against the manufacturer in a proceeding brought under ORS 646A.400 to 646A.418. [Formerly 646.361; 2009 c.448 §7]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2008–2008 · leading case: Liles v. Damon Corp., 198 P.3d 926 (Or. 2008).
Liles v. Damon Corp., 198 P.3d 926 (Or. 2008). “412(1) describes additional remedies available to a consumer in a successful action under the statute “against a manufacturer * * ORS 646A.414(1) confirms that the statute does not create an action against a vehicle dealer.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 646A.414(1) — 1 case
Liles v. Damon Corp., 198 P.3d 926 (Or. 2008). “412(1) describes additional remedies available to a consumer in a successful action under the statute “against a manufacturer * * ORS 646A.414(1) confirms that the statute does not create an action against a vehicle dealer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.