Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 650.085 (2026)
Other civil or criminal remedies unaffected
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
650.085 Other civil or criminal remedies unaffected. Nothing in ORS 650.005 to 650.100 limits any statutory or common-law rights of a person to bring an action in any court for an act involved in the sale of franchises, or the right of the state to punish a person for a violation of any law. [1973 c.509 §12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2000–2004 · leading case: Towne v. Robbins, 331 F. Supp. 2d 1269 (D. Or. 2004).
Towne v. Robbins, 331 F. Supp. 2d 1269 (D. Or. 2004). “ORS 650.085. The Franchise Act’s preservation of plaintiffs’ right to pursue common law claims, such as those based in fraud — for which a discovery rule would apply (see ORS 12.”
State ex rel. Dep't of Forestry v. Louisiana Pac. Corp., 999 P.2d 487 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). “Goodyear frames the analysis — and is, in many material respects, closely analogous. In Goodyear, the court considered whether there was a right to a jury trial under the Oregon Franchise Act (OFA).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.