Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.256 (2026)

Considerations for rules regarding certain rural hospitals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      656.256 Considerations for rules regarding certain rural hospitals. Whenever the Workers’ Compensation Division of the Department of Consumer and Business Services adopts any rule affecting a type A or B rural hospital, the division shall take into consideration the risk assessment formula set forth in ORS 442.520 (2). [1991 c.947 §19]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2021 · leading case: Speciality Risk Servs. v. Royal Indem. Co., 164 P.3d 300 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Speciality Risk Servs. v. Royal Indem. Co., 164 P.3d 300 (Or. Ct. App. 2007). “The substance of plaintiffs complaint is not a “matter concerning a claim” that this court has said is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the WCB, and neither of the specific statutory remedies that defendant identifies — ORS 656.256(6) or ORS 656.307— created applicable…”
Fed. Express Corp. v. Estrada, 364 P.3d 25 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “” Claimant acknowledged that he had not notified employer of the injury within 90 days, as ORS 656.256(1) ordinarily requires. He argued that his claim was nonetheless not time-barred because he gave employer notice within one year after the injury occurred and he had good cause…”
Double Tree Hotel v. Ansarinezhad, 504 P.3d 41 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “Employer denied the claim on the ground that claimant had failed to give timely notice under ORS 656.256. The issue on review is the intended meaning of the phrase “notice required by this section” in ORS 656.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.256(1) — 1 case
Fed. Express Corp. v. Estrada, 364 P.3d 25 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “” Claimant acknowledged that he had not notified employer of the injury within 90 days, as ORS 656.256(1) ordinarily requires. He argued that his claim was nonetheless not time-barred because he gave employer notice within one year after the injury occurred and he had good cause…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.256(6) — 1 case
Speciality Risk Servs. v. Royal Indem. Co., 164 P.3d 300 (Or. Ct. App. 2007). “The substance of plaintiffs complaint is not a “matter concerning a claim” that this court has said is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the WCB, and neither of the specific statutory remedies that defendant identifies — ORS 656.256(6) or ORS 656.307— created applicable…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.