Oregon Revised Statutes
Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.263 (2026)
To whom notices sent under ORS 656.262, 656.265, 656.268 to 656.289, 656.295 to 656.325 and 656.382 to 656.388
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
656.263 To whom notices sent under ORS 656.262, 656.265, 656.268 to 656.289, 656.295 to 656.325 and 656.382 to 656.388. All notices of proceedings required to be sent under ORS 656.262, 656.265, 656.268 to 656.289, 656.295 to 656.325, 656.382 to 656.388 and this section shall be sent to the employer and the insurer, if any. [1967 c.97 §2; 1975 c.556 §42]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Alvarez v. GAB Bus. Servs., Inc., 696 P.2d 1131 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
Alvarez v. GAB Bus. Servs., Inc., 696 P.2d 1131 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “The referee’s order that the aggravation “claim shall be processed in accordance with ORS 656.263” was affirmed by the Board. Because it is apparent that the referee made a scrivener’s error in referring to ORS 656.”
Emery v. Adjustco, 727 P.2d 622 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). “ORS 656.263(6). As we understand Adjustco’s argument, it asserts that Altrocchi’s report fails to satisfy the statutory requirement of a medically verified inability to work resulting from a worsened condition, ORS 656.”
Liberty Nw. Ins. Corp. v. Short, 795 P.2d 118 (Or. Ct. App. 1990). “" Employer argues that an injured worker's absence from work must exceed three days before he is entitled to temporary disability benefits by reason of an aggravation because, under ORS 656.263(6), an aggravation claim is processed in accordance with the provisions of ORS 656.”
Calvi v. Gallagher Bassett Servs. Inc., 347 Or. App. 281 (Or. Ct. App. 2026). “The concurrence stated: “Because the purpose of the ORS 656.263(5)(f) penalty provision was to allow claimants to seek penalties for unreasonable closures and deter carriers from abusing the closure process, I find that the additional burden placed on claimants seeking such a…”
Trevisan v. SAIF Corp., 932 P.2d 1202 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “Denial of a claim must satisfy the requirements of ORS 656.263(9). Nothing in the DCS put claimant on notice of the condition that SAIF now claims it was denying, its reason for the denial, or claimant’s appeal rights in the light of the so-called denial.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.263(5)(f) — 1 case
Calvi v. Gallagher Bassett Servs. Inc., 347 Or. App. 281 (Or. Ct. App. 2026). “The concurrence stated: “Because the purpose of the ORS 656.263(5)(f) penalty provision was to allow claimants to seek penalties for unreasonable closures and deter carriers from abusing the closure process, I find that the additional burden placed on claimants seeking such a…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.263(6) — 2 cases
Emery v. Adjustco, 727 P.2d 622 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). “ORS 656.263(6). As we understand Adjustco’s argument, it asserts that Altrocchi’s report fails to satisfy the statutory requirement of a medically verified inability to work resulting from a worsened condition, ORS 656.”
Liberty Nw. Ins. Corp. v. Short, 795 P.2d 118 (Or. Ct. App. 1990). “" Employer argues that an injured worker's absence from work must exceed three days before he is entitled to temporary disability benefits by reason of an aggravation because, under ORS 656.263(6), an aggravation claim is processed in accordance with the provisions of ORS 656.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.263(9) — 1 case
Trevisan v. SAIF Corp., 932 P.2d 1202 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “Denial of a claim must satisfy the requirements of ORS 656.263(9). Nothing in the DCS put claimant on notice of the condition that SAIF now claims it was denying, its reason for the denial, or claimant’s appeal rights in the light of the so-called denial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.