Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.407 (2026)

Qualifications of insured employers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      656.407 Qualifications of insured employers. (1) An employer shall establish proof with the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services that the employer is qualified either:

      (a) As a carrier-insured employer by causing proof of coverage provided by an insurer to be filed with the director; or

      (b) As a self-insured employer by establishing proof that the employer has:

      (A) An adequate staff qualified to process claims promptly; and

      (B) The financial ability to make certain the prompt payment of all compensation and other payments that may become due to the director under this chapter.

      (2) Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, a self-insured employer shall establish proof of financial ability required under subsection (1)(b) of this section by:

      (a) Demonstrating acceptable financial viability based on information required by the director by rule; and

      (b) Providing security that the director determines acceptable by rule.

      (3)(a) Security provided under subsection (2)(b) of this section must be in an amount reasonably sufficient to ensure payment of compensation and other payments that may become due to the director but not less than the employer’s normal expected annual claim liabilities and in no event less than $100,000.

      (b) In arriving at the amount of security required under this subsection, the director may take into consideration the financial ability of the employer to pay compensation and other payments and probable continuity of operation.

      (c) The security shall be held by the director to secure the payment of compensation for injuries to subject workers of the employer and to secure other payments that may become due from the employer to the director under this chapter.

      (d) Moneys received as security under this subsection shall be deposited with the State Treasurer in an account separate and distinct from the General Fund. Interest earned by the account shall be credited to the account.

      (e) The amount of security may be increased or decreased from time to time by the director.

      (4)(a) A city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group that wishes to be exempt from subsection (2) of this section may make written application for the exemption to the director.

      (b) The application shall include:

      (A) A copy of the most recent annual audit of the city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group filed with the Secretary of State under ORS 297.405 to 297.740;

      (B) Information regarding the establishment of a loss reserve account for the payment of compensation to injured workers; and

      (C) Such other information as the director may require.

      (c) The director shall approve the application and the city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group shall be exempt from subsection (2) of this section if the director finds that:

      (A) The city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group has been self-insured in compliance with subsection (2) of this section for more than three consecutive years prior to making the application referred to in this subsection.

      (B) The city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group has in effect a loss reserve account:

      (i) That is actuarially sound and that is adequately funded as determined by an annual audit under ORS 297.405 to 297.740 to pay all compensation to injured workers and amounts due the director pursuant to this chapter. A copy of the annual audit shall be filed with the director. Upon a finding that there is probable cause to believe that the loss reserve account is not actuarially sound, the director may require a city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group to obtain an independent actuarial audit of the loss reserve account. The requirements of this subsection are in addition to and not in lieu of any other audit or reporting requirement otherwise prescribed by or pursuant to law.

      (ii) That is dedicated to and may be expended only for the payment of compensation and amounts due the director by the city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group under this chapter.

      (d) The director shall have the first lien and priority right to the full amount of the loss reserve account required to pay the present discounted value of all present and future claims under this chapter.

      (e)(A) The city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group shall notify the director no later than 60 days prior to any action to discontinue the loss reserve account.

      (B) The city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group shall advise the director of its plans to submit the security required under subsection (2)(b) of this section, or obtain coverage as a carrier-insured employer prior to the date the loss reserve account ceases to exist.

      (C) If the city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group elects to discontinue self-insurance, it shall submit such security as the director may require to ensure payment of all compensation and amounts due the director for the period the city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group was self-insured.

      (f) In order to requalify as a self-insured employer, the city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group must deposit the security required under subsection (2)(b) of this section prior to discontinuance of the loss reserve account.

      (g) Notwithstanding ORS 656.440, if the director has not received the security required under subsection (2)(b) of this section prior to the date of discontinuance of the loss reserve account, the certificate of self-insurance of the city, county, school district or qualified self-insured employer group is automatically revoked as of that date.

      (5) As used in this section:

      (a) “Qualified self-insured employer group” means a self-insured employer group that is a municipal corporation or a public corporation, as those terms are defined in ORS 297.405.

      (b) “School district” has the meaning given that term in ORS 255.005. [1975 c.556 §27; 1979 c.839 §28; 1981 c.854 §27; 1985 c.212 §7; 1989 c.966 §67; 1991 c.648 §1; 1993 c.18 §140; 2003 c.170 §2; 2007 c.241 §13; 2013 c.471 §1; 2014 c.48 §3; 2025 c.234 §1]

 

      656.408 [Renumbered 656.716]

 

      656.409 [1965 c.285 §75(2),(3); repealed by 1975 c.556 §54]

 

      656.410 [Amended by 1965 c.285 §54; renumbered 656.726]

 

      656.411 [1975 c.556 §28; 1979 c.348 §1; repealed by 1981 c.854 §1]

 

      656.412 [Amended by 1965 c.285 §52; renumbered 656.732]

 

      656.413 [1965 c.285 §76(1),(2); repealed by 1975 c.556 §54]

 

      656.414 [Renumbered 656.718]

 

      656.415 [1975 c.556 §30; repealed by 1981 c.854 §1]

 

      656.416 [Amended by 1965 c.285 §53; renumbered 656.722]

 

      656.417 [1965 c.285 §76 (3),(8); 1967 c.341 §6; repealed by 1975 c.556 §54]

 

      656.418 [Repealed by 1965 c.285 §95]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2023 · leading case: Dep't of Consum. & Bus. Servs. v. Muliro, 380 P.3d 270 (Or. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dep't of Consum. & Bus. Servs. v. Muliro, 380 P.3d 270 (Or. 2016). “ent of Consumer and Business Services that subject workers of the employer and their beneficiaries will receive compensation for compensable injuries as provided by this chapter and that the employer will perform all duties and pay other obligations required under this chapter,…”
Eckles v. State of Oregon, 760 P.2d 846 (Or. 1988). · cites it 2× “See ORS 656.407(1), 656.751(1), 656.752. In September 1982, a special session of the Legislative Assembly determined that the IAF had a "surplus" of over $168 million.”
Blacknall v. Westwood Corp., 764 P.2d 544 (Or. 1988). · cites it 4× “maintain assurance with the director that subject workers of the employer and their beneficiaries will receive compensation for compensable injuries as provided by this chapter and that the employer will perform all duties and pay other obligations required under this chapter,…”
Dep't of Consum. & Bus. Servs. v. Zurich Am., 268 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 15× “017(1) and ORS 656.407, ORS 656.850(3) presumes that — as between the two potential employers 9 — the worker-leasing company will be the responsible employer unless the client undertakes that responsibility.”
Juarez v. Windsor Rock Prods., Inc., 144 P.3d 211 (Or. 2006). “ent of Consumer and Business Services that subject workers of the employer and their beneficiaries will receive compensation for compensable injuries as provided by this chapter and that the employer will perform all duties and pay other obligations required under this chapter,…”
West Hills Dev. Co. v. Inc, 391 P.3d 851 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). “403 (self-insured employers’ responsibilities); ORS 656.407 (self-insured qualification and required security).”
Bird v. Norpac Foods, Inc., 934 P.2d 382 (Or. 1997). “maintain assurance with the director that subject workers of the employer and their beneficiaries will receive compensation for compensable injuries as provided by this chapter and that the employer will perform all duties and pay other obligations required under this chapter,…”
Love v. Nw. Expl. Co., 678 P.2d 754 (Or. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “lving the performance of labor and such labor is performed by the person to whom the contract was let, with assistance of others, all persons engaged in the performance of the contract are deemed subject workers of the person letting the contract unless the person to whom the…”
Dep't of Consum. & Bus. Servs. v. Zurich Am., 283 P.3d 357 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 6× “017 and ORS 656.407 have not been met by either of them.”
E. W. Eldridge, Inc. v. Becker, 700 P.2d 301 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “lving the performance of labor and such labor is performed by the person to whom the contract was let, with assistance of others, all persons engaged in the performance of the contract are deemed subject workers of the person letting the contract unless the person to whom the…”
In Re Comp. of Mccoy, 268 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 15× “017(1) and ORS 656.407, ORS 656.850(3) presumes that—as between the two potential employers [9] —the worker-leasing company will be the responsible employer unless the client undertakes that responsibility.”
Baugh v. Maint. & Mach. Erectors, Inc., 968 P.2d 392 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). “017 and ORS 656.407 (1993) to provide workers’ compensation insurance for all workers supplied to MME, and plaintiff received the benefit of it having done so.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.407(1) — 4 cases
Eckles v. State of Oregon, 760 P.2d 846 (Or. 1988). “See ORS 656.407(1), 656.751(1), 656.752. In September 1982, a special session of the Legislative Assembly determined that the IAF had a "surplus" of over $168 million.”
Blacknall v. Westwood Corp., 764 P.2d 544 (Or. 1988). “maintain assurance with the director that subject workers of the employer and their beneficiaries will receive compensation for compensable injuries as provided by this chapter and that the employer will perform all duties and pay other obligations required under this chapter,…”
Dep't of Consum. & Bus. Servs. v. Zurich Am., 268 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “017(1) and ORS 656.407, ORS 656.850(3) presumes that — as between the two potential employers 9 — the worker-leasing company will be the responsible employer unless the client undertakes that responsibility.”
In Re Comp. of Mccoy, 268 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “017(1) and ORS 656.407, ORS 656.850(3) presumes that—as between the two potential employers [9] —the worker-leasing company will be the responsible employer unless the client undertakes that responsibility.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.407(1)(a) — 2 cases
Blacknall v. Westwood Corp., 764 P.2d 544 (Or. 1988). “maintain assurance with the director that subject workers of the employer and their beneficiaries will receive compensation for compensable injuries as provided by this chapter and that the employer will perform all duties and pay other obligations required under this chapter,…”
In Re Comp. of Mccoy, 268 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “017(1) and ORS 656.407, ORS 656.850(3) presumes that—as between the two potential employers [9] —the worker-leasing company will be the responsible employer unless the client undertakes that responsibility.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.407(l)(a) — 1 case
Dep't of Consum. & Bus. Servs. v. Zurich Am., 268 P.3d 671 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “017(1) and ORS 656.407, ORS 656.850(3) presumes that — as between the two potential employers 9 — the worker-leasing company will be the responsible employer unless the client undertakes that responsibility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.