656.753 State Accident
Insurance Fund Corporation exempt from certain financial administration laws;
contracts with state agencies for services. (1) Except as otherwise provided by law, the
provisions of ORS 279.835 to 279.855 and 283.085 to 283.092 and ORS chapters
240, 276, 279A, 279B, 279C, 282, 283, 291, 292 and 293 do not apply to the
State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation.
(2) In carrying
out the duties, functions and powers imposed by law upon the State Accident
Insurance Fund Corporation, the board of directors or the manager of the State
Accident Insurance Fund Corporation may contract with any state agency for the
performance of such duties, functions and powers as the corporation considers
appropriate.
(3)
Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2) of this section, ORS 293.240 except for
appeals pursuant to ORS 737.318, ORS 293.260, 293.262 and 293.505 (2) shall
apply to the directors, manager, assistants and accounts of the State Accident
Insurance Fund Corporation and any subsidiary corporation formed or acquired by
the State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation.
(4)
Notwithstanding subsection (1) or (2) of this section, ORS 243.305, 279A.100
and 659A.012 apply to the directors, manager and employees of the State
Accident Insurance Fund Corporation. [1979 c.829 §4; 1981 c.876 §8; subsection
(3) enacted as 1983 c.412 §2; subsection (4) enacted as 1983 c.808 §4; 1987
c.884 §5; 2003 c.794 §310; 2012 c.107 §67]
Notes of Decisions
Frohnmayer v. State Accident Ins. Fund Corp., 660 P.2d 1061 (Or. 1983).
· cites it 3× “These exemptions are now found in ORS 656.753(1). 5 Had the legislature intended that SAIF Corporation not be subject to ORS chapter 180, it likely would have included *580 chapter 180 with the other exemptions enumerated in ORS 656.”
Johnson v. SAIF Corp., 122 P.3d 66 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 3× “As we have noted, for example, what is now ORS 656.753 authorizes SAIF to “contract with any state agency,” implying that SAIF is not simply another state agency.”
Rushing v. SAIF Corp., 196 P.3d 115 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
· cites it 3× “SAIF contended that, under ORS 656.753, it is not subject to state personnel statutes or rules.”
Dryden v. State Accident Ins. Fund Corp., 746 P.2d 240 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 2× “Certain distinctions may be drawn between SAIF and other governmental entities that are “public bodies” under OTCA, see ORS 656.753, but none of those distinctions is relevant, because SAIF is operated as a public corporation.”
Johnson v. SAIF Corp., 164 P.3d 278 (Or. 2007).
“SAIF is exempt from the pervasive state regulations contained in the state personnel relations law, public contracting and purchasing statutes, state printing statutes, interagency services statutes, state financial administration statutes, and statutes respecting the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.753(1) — 3 cases
Frohnmayer v. State Accident Ins. Fund Corp., 660 P.2d 1061 (Or. 1983).
“These exemptions are now found in ORS 656.753(1). 5 Had the legislature intended that SAIF Corporation not be subject to ORS chapter 180, it likely would have included *580 chapter 180 with the other exemptions enumerated in ORS 656.”
Johnson v. SAIF Corp., 164 P.3d 278 (Or. 2007).
“SAIF is exempt from the pervasive state regulations contained in the state personnel relations law, public contracting and purchasing statutes, state printing statutes, interagency services statutes, state financial administration statutes, and statutes respecting the…”
Rushing v. SAIF Corp., 196 P.3d 115 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
“SAIF contended that, under ORS 656.753, it is not subject to state personnel statutes or rules.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.