Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 656.794 (2026)

Advisory committee on medical care; rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      656.794 Advisory committee on medical care; rules. There shall be created an advisory committee on medical care. This committee shall consist of members appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services to advise the director on matters relating to the provision of medical care to workers. The director by rule shall determine the composition of the committee. Membership of the committee shall include representatives of the types of health care providers that are most representative of health care providers providing medical care services to injured workers. The committee shall also include one representative of insurers, one representative of employers, one representative of workers, one representative of managed care organizations and other persons as the director may determine are necessary to carry out the purpose of the committee. Members of the committee shall be paid travel and other necessary expenses for service as a member. Such payments shall be made from the Consumer and Business Services Fund. [1965 c.285 §27; 1981 c.535 §46; 1981 c.854 §54; 1987 c.884 §26; 1999 c.879 §1]

 

INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS ABOUT WORKERS’ COMPENSATION SYSTEM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1985–1992 · leading case: Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 702 P.2d 403 (Or. 1985).
Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 702 P.2d 403 (Or. 1985). · cites it 2× “001 to ORS 656.794. Then follows, in order, just as in Oregon Compiled Laws Annotated, the method of calculating benefits to be paid for death, permanent total disability, death during permanent total disability, temporary *412 total disability, temporary partial disability and…”
Young v. Mobil Oil Corp., 735 P.2d 654 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “On April 15, 1980, plaintiff, an employe of Myers, suffered injuries at Mobil’s plant while delivering reconditioned drums.”
Howard v. Liberty Nw. Ins., 765 P.2d 223 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 3× “001 to ORS 656.794[,] are subject to the procedural provisions of ORS 656.”
Alsea Veneer, Inc. v. State of Oregon, 843 P.2d 492 (Or. Ct. App. 1992). “001 to ORS 656.794],” which relate to workers’ compensation.”
Brown v. SAIF Corp., 717 P.2d 1289 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). “001 to ORS 656.794, nor the Occupational Disease Law, ORS 656.”
Ring v. Paper Distrib. Servs., Inc., 750 P.2d 1205 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). “001 to ORS 656.794 is required, if requested by the director, the insurer or self insured employer, to submit to a medical examination at a time and from time to time at a place reasonably convenient for the worker and as may be provided by the rules of the director.”
Liberty Nw. Ins. v. SAIF Corp., 784 P.2d 123 (Or. Ct. App. 1989). “001 to ORS 656.794. The director has delegated his authority to carry out the statutes, rules and bulletins relating to employer coverage to the department’s Workers’ Compensation Division.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.