Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 657.280 (2026)

General procedure and records concerning disputed claims

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      657.280 General procedure and records concerning disputed claims. (1) The manner in which disputed claims shall be presented and the reports thereon required from the claimant and from the employers shall be in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Director of the Employment Department.

      (2) A full and complete record shall be kept of all proceedings in connection with the disputed claim. All testimony at any hearing upon a disputed claim shall be recorded but need not be transcribed unless the disputed claim is appealed further. [Amended by 1983 c.522 §3; 1999 c.849 §§127,128; 2003 c.75 §50]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1962–1982 · leading case: McPherson v. Emp. Div., 591 P.2d 1381 (Or. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McPherson v. Emp. Div., 591 P.2d 1381 (Or. 1979). · cites it 2× “685(6) and for prescribing regulations for "the conduct of hearings and appeals" on disputed claims, ORS 657.280. [3] In NLRB v. Marcus Trucking Co.”
Stevenson v. Morgan, 522 P.2d 1204 (Or. Ct. App. 1974). “However, ORS 657.280 states that the conduct of hearings before the referee and an appeal to the Board shall be in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Administrator of the Employment Division as authorized by ORS 657.”
Cameron v. DeBoard, 370 P.2d 709 (Or. 1962). “If the administrator decides he needs rules to apply to these cases he has the power to adopt them, ORS 657.280. That is an administrative function, not a judicial one.”
Paillette v. Emp. Div., 651 P.2d 1087 (Or. Ct. App. 1982). “280 provides that the conduct of hearings before the referee and an appeal to EAB shall be in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the administrator of the Employment Division as authorized by ORS 657.610, the scope of review by EAB depends upon rules promulgated by the…”
Bierly v. Emp. Div., 606 P.2d 691 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). “275; ORS 657.280; see OAR 471-41-005 to 471-41-030.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.