662.010 Labor
disputes. (1) As
used in ORS 662.010 to 662.130, “labor dispute” includes any controversy
concerning terms or conditions of employment, or concerning the association or
representation of persons in negotiating, fixing, maintaining, changing or
seeking to arrange terms or conditions of employment, regardless of whether or
not the disputants stand in the proximate relation of employer and employee.
(2) For the
purposes of ORS 662.010 to 662.130, a case involves or grows out of a labor
dispute when:
(a) The case
involves persons who are engaged in the same industry, trade, craft or
occupation, or who have direct or indirect interests therein, or who are
employees of the same employer, or who are members of the same or an affiliated
organization of employers or employees, whether such dispute is:
(A) Between one
or more employers or associations of employers and one or more employees or
associations of employees;
(B) Between one
or more employers or associations of employers and one or more employers or
associations of employers; or
(C) Between one
or more employees or associations of employees and one or more employees or
associations of employees; or
(b) The case
involves any conflicting or competing interests in a labor dispute of persons
participating or interested therein.
(3) For the
purposes of ORS 662.010 to 662.130, a person or association is a person
participating or interested in a labor dispute if relief is sought against the
person or association, and if the person or association:
(a) Is engaged in
the same industry, trade, craft or occupation in which such dispute occurs.
(b) Has a direct
or indirect interest therein.
(c) Is a member,
officer or agent of any association composed in whole or in part of employers
or employees engaged in such industry, trade, craft or occupation. [Amended by
1987 c.158 §130; 2023 c.9 §50]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases, 1955–2009 · leading case:
State v. Borowski, 220 P.3d 100 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. Borowski, 220 P.3d 100 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 5× ““(3) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section do not apply to: “(a) A person who is involved in a labor dispute as defined in ORS 662.010 with the other person; or “(b) A public employee who is performing official duties.”
Vaughn v. Pac. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 611 P.2d 281 (Or. 1980).
“040 provides: "No court, nor any judge thereof, shall have jurisdiction to issue any restraining order or temporary or permanent injunction in a case involving or growing out of a labor dispute, except in strict conformity with ORS 662.010 to 662.130, nor shall any such…”
Pineros Y Campesinos Unidos Del Noroeste v. Goldschmidt, 790 F. Supp. 216 (D. Or. 1990).
· cites it 4× “ISSUES Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion and Defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss raise the following legal issues: (1) whether the statute violates the First Amendment guarantees of free speech and peaceful assembly; (2) whether the statute violates the equal protection…”
Gilbertson v. McLEAN, 341 P.2d 139 (Or. 1959).
· cites it 2× “Central Labor Council, supra. One effect of the Anti-Injunction Act was to change the law as announced in the Heitkemper case by withdrawing from the courts the jurisdiction to issue injunctions in cases involving or growing out of a dispute over the recognition of a union…”
State v. Norris-Romine, 894 P.2d 1221 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).
“730(7) provides: “ ‘Legitimate purpose’ includes, but is not limited to, otherwise lawful contact that is related to and occurs during a labor dispute as defined in ORS 662.010.” Defendant Finley was charged under ORS 163.”
Rauda v. Oregon Roses, Inc., 935 P.2d 469 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 6× “We turn to ORS 662.010 to ORS 662.130, first enacted in 1933.”
Fianza Cia Nav. S. A. v. Benz, 178 F. Supp. 243 (D. Or. 1958).
“, or Oregon’s Little Norris-LaGuardia Act, ORS 662.010 et seq. ? If there is a labor dispute, then the jurisdiction of this Court with reference to injunctive matters and labor disputes is greatly restricted and this Court acknowledged that.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 662.010(1) — 3 cases
State v. Borowski, 220 P.3d 100 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
““(3) The provisions of subsection (1) of this section do not apply to: “(a) A person who is involved in a labor dispute as defined in ORS 662.010 with the other person; or “(b) A public employee who is performing official duties.”
Pineros Y Campesinos Unidos Del Noroeste v. Goldschmidt, 790 F. Supp. 216 (D. Or. 1990).
“ISSUES Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion and Defendant’s renewed motion to dismiss raise the following legal issues: (1) whether the statute violates the First Amendment guarantees of free speech and peaceful assembly; (2) whether the statute violates the equal protection…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.