Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 663.125 (2026)

Other employer unfair labor practices

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      663.125 Other employer unfair labor practices. It is an unfair labor practice for an employer, by discrimination in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment, to encourage or discourage membership in a labor organization. However:

      (1) Nothing in this chapter or in any other statute of this state precludes an employer from making an agreement with a labor organization (not established, maintained or assisted by any action defined in this section or in ORS 663.120 as an unfair labor practice) to require as a condition of employment membership therein on or after the 30th day following the beginning of such employment or the effective date of such agreement, whichever is the later:

      (a) If the labor organization is the representative of the majority of the employees in the appropriate collective-bargaining unit covered by the agreement when made; and

      (b) Unless following an election held within one year preceding the effective date of the agreement, at least a majority of the employees eligible to vote in the election have voted to rescind the authority of the labor organization to make such an agreement.

      (2) No employer shall justify any discrimination against an employee for nonmembership in a labor organization if the employer has reasonable grounds for believing that membership was:

      (a) Not available to the employee on the same terms and conditions generally applicable to other members; or

      (b) Denied or terminated for reasons other than the failure of the employee to tender the periodic dues and the initiation fees uniformly required as a condition of acquiring or retaining membership. [1971 c.729 §8]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1977–2007 · leading case: Sizemore v. Myers, 157 P.3d 188 (Or. 2007).
Sizemore v. Myers, 157 P.3d 188 (Or. 2007). “The legislature modeled ORS 663.125(1), the prohibition against membership-based discrimination, on its federal counterpart, 29 USC section 158 (a) (3), in Pattern Makers .”
Oregon State Employes Ass'n v. Oregon State Univ., 567 P.2d 1085 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “” 2 As further evidence the legislature intended to give different treatment to union security under public employe bargaining is ORS 663.125 which is part of chapter 663 relating to collective bargaining in the private industry.”
Rauda v. Oregon Roses, Inc., 935 P.2d 469 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “…an "unfair labor practice" for an employer to discharge an employee for organizing with other employees. See, e.g., ORS 663.125.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 663.125(1) — 1 case
Sizemore v. Myers, 157 P.3d 188 (Or. 2007). “The legislature modeled ORS 663.125(1), the prohibition against membership-based discrimination, on its federal counterpart, 29 USC section 158 (a) (3), in Pattern Makers .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.