Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 672.325 (2026)

Civil penalties

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      672.325 Civil penalties. (1) In addition to any other penalty provided by law, any person who violates any provision of ORS 672.002 to 672.325 or any rule adopted thereunder shall forfeit and pay to the State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying a civil penalty in an amount determined by the board of not more than $1,000 for each offense.

      (2) Civil penalties under this section shall be imposed as provided in ORS 183.745.

      (3) Notwithstanding ORS 670.335, civil penalties recovered under this section shall be deposited into an account established by the board as provided in ORS 182.470. Moneys deposited are appropriated continuously to the board and shall be used only for the administration and enforcement of ORS 182.456 to 182.472 and 672.002 to 672.325. [1981 c.150 §2; 1991 c.734 §67; 1997 c.643 §22; 1999 c.1084 §62]

 

      672.330 [Repealed by 1971 c.753 §74]

 

      672.340 [Repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

      672.410 [Amended by 1961 c.550 §1; repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

      672.420 [Amended by 1971 c.751 §7; renumbered 672.025]

 

      672.430 [Repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

      672.440 [Repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

      672.450 [Repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

      672.460 [Repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

      672.470 [Repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

      672.480 [Repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

      672.490 [Repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

      672.500 [Repealed by 1971 c.751 §39]

 

GEOLOGISTS

 

(Generally)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2015 · leading case: Topaz v. Oregon Bd. of Examiners for Eng'g & Land Surveying, 297 P.3d 498 (Or. Ct. App. 2013).
Topaz v. Oregon Bd. of Examiners for Eng'g & Land Surveying, 297 P.3d 498 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “Or Laws 1971, ch 743, § 9. A violation is an offense where the penalty is a fine and not imprisonment.”
Durette v. Virgil, 356 P.3d 639 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “We conclude that we need not determine whether Probst’s work or testimony was the practice of engineering because, even if it was, ORS 672.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.