Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 675.300 (2026)

Grounds and procedures for denial, refusal to renew, suspension or revocation of license; confidentiality of information

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      675.300 Grounds and procedures for denial, refusal to renew, suspension or revocation of license; confidentiality of information. (1) The Occupational Therapy Licensing Board may deny, suspend, revoke or refuse to renew a license or may impose probationary conditions where the licensee or applicant has:

      (a) Committed unprofessional conduct as defined by the standards established by the board;

      (b) Obtained or attempted to obtain a license by means of fraud, misrepresentation or concealment of material facts;

      (c) Violated any provision of ORS 675.210 to 675.340 or 675.850 or any order or rule adopted by the board; or

      (d) Committed gross negligence or incompetence in the performance of professional duties.

      (2) The board may suspend or revoke the license of any person licensed under ORS 675.210 to 675.340 if the licensee has an impairment as defined in ORS 676.303.

      (3) When the board proposes to refuse to issue or renew a license or proposes to revoke or suspend a license, opportunity for hearing shall be accorded as provided in ORS chapter 183.

      (4) Judicial review of orders under subsection (3) of this section shall be conducted in accordance with ORS chapter 183.

      (5) Information that the board obtains as part of an investigation into licensee or applicant conduct or as part of a contested case proceeding, consent order or stipulated agreement involving licensee or applicant conduct is confidential as provided under ORS 676.175. [1977 c.858 §§13,14,15; 1997 c.791 §12; 2009 c.756 §9; 2011 c.132 §1; 2015 c.79 §3]

 

(Board)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1980–1980 · leading case: Megdal v. Oregon State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 605 P.2d 273 (Or. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Megdal v. Oregon State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 605 P.2d 273 (Or. 1980). · cites it 2× “110(10), occupational therapists, ORS 675.300(1)(a), audiologists, ORS 681.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 675.300(1)(a): 1 case
Megdal v. Oregon State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 605 P.2d 273 (Or. 1980). “110(10), occupational therapists, ORS 675.300(1)(a), audiologists, ORS 681.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 675.300(l)(a): 1 case
Megdal v. Oregon State Bd. of Dental Examiners, 605 P.2d 273 (Or. 1980). “110(10), occupational therapists, ORS 675.300(1)(a), audiologists, ORS 681.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.